These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8959415)

  • 1. Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women.
    Kalmuss D; Davidson AR; Cushman LF; Heartwell S; Rulin M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):256-60. PubMed ID: 8959415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
    Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early experience with the contraceptive use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in an inner-city clinic population.
    Polaneczky M; Guarnaccia M; Alon J; Wiley J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 8853283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing repeat adolescent pregnancies with early adoption of the contraceptive implant.
    Stevens-Simon C; Kelly L; Singer D
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 10224547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adolescents' reasons for and experience after discontinuation of the long-acting contraceptives Depo-Provera and Norplant.
    Harel Z; Biro FM; Kollar LM; Rauh JL
    J Adolesc Health; 1996 Aug; 19(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 8863083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability study of the two versus three monthly injectable contraceptives.
    Aly FA; El-genedi MM; Toppozada HK; El-abd M; Loutfi I
    Dirasat Sukkaniyah; 1984; 11(69):27-39. PubMed ID: 12179796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics and attitudes of early contraceptive implant acceptors in Texas.
    Frank ML; Poindexter AN; Johnson ML; Bateman L
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):208-13. PubMed ID: 1426182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contraceptive risk-taking in a medically underserved, low-income population.
    Radecki SE; Beckman LJ
    Soc Biol; 1993; 40(3-4):248-59. PubMed ID: 8178193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women.
    Forrest JD; Frost JJ
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):246-55, 277. PubMed ID: 8959414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative study of the perceptions of dissatisfied Norplant users.
    Musham C; Darr EG; Strossner ML
    J Fam Pract; 1995 May; 40(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 7730770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The introduction of a new contraceptive; two years experience with Norplant.
    Davie J; Hiremath K; Glasier A
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1996 Jul; 54(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 8783485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD; Samara R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting contraceptive use in women seeking pregnancy tests: Missouri, 1997.
    Sable MR; Libbus MK; Chiu JE
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 10894258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women.
    Glei DA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 10224545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Menstrual changes during Norplant use and return of fertility following Norplant implant removal: the Singapore experience.
    Singh K; Viegas OA; Ratnam SS
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1991; 7(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 12284216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.
    Bigrigg A; Evans M; Gbolade B; Newton J; Pollard L; Szarewski A; Thomas C; Walling M
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10454658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adolescent girls' attitudes toward contraceptive subdermal implants.
    Dabrow SM; Merrick CL; Conlon M
    J Adolesc Health; 1995 May; 16(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 7662685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Norplant and its side effects].
    Kato K; Joachim A; Nielsen P; Habib ND
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(5):260-2. PubMed ID: 7793168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant contraception in Singaporean women: one decade of experience in KK Women's and Children's Hospital.
    Kang W; Tan KH
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Oct; 45(10):482-6. PubMed ID: 15455169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are US women not using long-acting contraceptives?
    Tanfer K; Wierzbicki S; Payn B
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(4):176-83, 191. PubMed ID: 10942353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.