These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8959598)

  • 1. Consonant confusions in amplitude-expanded speech.
    Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 39(6):1124-37. PubMed ID: 8959598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
    Dubno JR; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Van Tasell DJ; Soli SD; Kirby VM; Widin GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1152-61. PubMed ID: 3680774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.
    Brennan M; Souza P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19927675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of two speech enhancement techniques to improve intelligibility for hearing-impaired adults.
    Montgomery AA; Edge RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):386-93. PubMed ID: 3172755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactive factors in consonant confusion patterns.
    Bell TS; Dirks DD; Carterette EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):339-46. PubMed ID: 2921416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.
    Phatak SA; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2312-26. PubMed ID: 17471744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Souza PE; Forget LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2964-73. PubMed ID: 11425138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.