These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8960988)
1. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy. Kadanali S; Küçüközkan T; Zor N; Kumtepe Y Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Nov; 55(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8960988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods. Yapar EG; Senöz S; Urkütür M; Batioglu S; Gökmen O Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Nov; 69(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8902440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction. Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial. Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH; Chang FM J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction. Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Del Valle GO; Delke I; Schroeder PA; Briones DK Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 8437780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary. Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison. Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative trial of labor induction with misoprostol versus oxytocin. Escudero F; Contreras H Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 May; 57(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 9184950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Jozwiak M; Dodd JM Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section. Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term. Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial. Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction. Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]