BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8960988)

  • 1. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.
    Kadanali S; Küçüközkan T; Zor N; Kumtepe Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Nov; 55(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8960988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods.
    Yapar EG; Senöz S; Urkütür M; Batioglu S; Gökmen O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Nov; 69(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8902440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Del Valle GO; Delke I; Schroeder PA; Briones DK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 8437780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
    Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative trial of labor induction with misoprostol versus oxytocin.
    Escudero F; Contreras H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 May; 57(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 9184950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
    Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial.
    Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.