277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8960988)
1. Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.
Kadanali S; Küçüközkan T; Zor N; Kumtepe Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Nov; 55(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8960988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second trimester pregnancy termination including fetal death: comparison of five different methods.
Yapar EG; Senöz S; Urkütür M; Batioglu S; Gökmen O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Nov; 69(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8902440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Del Valle GO; Delke I; Schroeder PA; Briones DK
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 8437780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative trial of labor induction with misoprostol versus oxytocin.
Escudero F; Contreras H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 May; 57(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 9184950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Wamsler M; Beyer J; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Schleussner E
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 26437956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: a randomized trial.
Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Biggio JR; Owen J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16157113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]