300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8961122)
1. Research ethics committees at work: the experience of one multi-location study.
While AE
J Med Ethics; 1996 Dec; 22(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 8961122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.
Ahmed AH; Nicholson KG
J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):263-6. PubMed ID: 8910776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical review of multi-centre research: a survey of local research ethics committees in the south Thames region.
Holley S; Foster C
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 9670151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responses of local research ethics committees to a study with approval from a multicentre research ethics committee.
Lux AL; Edwards SW; Osborne JP
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1182-3. PubMed ID: 10784542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Local research ethics committees.
Alberti KG
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):639-40. PubMed ID: 7549620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A national committee for the ethics of research.
Gelder MG
J Med Ethics; 1990 Sep; 16(3):146-7. PubMed ID: 2231640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions.
Blunt J; Savulescu J; Watson AJ
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7124):58-61. PubMed ID: 9451273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees.
Garfield P
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):660-1. PubMed ID: 7549634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees.
Redshaw ME; Harris A; Baum JD
J Med Ethics; 1996 Apr; 22(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 8731532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical appraisal for multi-centre medical research.
Drury M
J Med Ethics; 1990 Sep; 16(3):148-9. PubMed ID: 2231641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
Dal-Ré R; Espada J; Ortega R
J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are ethical committees reliable?
Hotopf M; Wessely S; Noah N
J R Soc Med; 1995 Jan; 88(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 7884767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local research ethics committees. Local committees have strengths too.
Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1995 Dec; 311(7019):1570-1. PubMed ID: 8520417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.
Foster CG; Marshall T; Moodie P
J Med Ethics; 1995 Aug; 21(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 7473640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview.
Smith T; Moore EJ; Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1588-90. PubMed ID: 9169403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research ethics committees.
BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6729):943. PubMed ID: 2337727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals.
Kent G
J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 10390686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are research ethics committees behaving unethically? Some suggestions for improving performance and accountability.
Savulescu J; Chalmers I; Blunt J
BMJ; 1996 Nov; 313(7069):1390-3. PubMed ID: 8956711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards?
While AE
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):661. PubMed ID: 7549635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
