These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8961347)
41. Predicting reliable regions in protein alignments from sequence profiles. Tress ML; Jones D; Valencia A J Mol Biol; 2003 Jul; 330(4):705-18. PubMed ID: 12850141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. RNA secondary structure prediction from sequence alignments using a network of k-nearest neighbor classifiers. Bindewald E; Shapiro BA RNA; 2006 Mar; 12(3):342-52. PubMed ID: 16495232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Structure prediction of proteins--where are we now? Rost B; Sander C Curr Opin Biotechnol; 1994 Aug; 5(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 7765169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone. Jaroszewski L; Li W; Godzik A Protein Sci; 2002 Jul; 11(7):1702-13. PubMed ID: 12070323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Jones DT; Singh T; Kosciolek T; Tetchner S Bioinformatics; 2015 Apr; 31(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 25431331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. Gotoh O J Mol Biol; 1996 Dec; 264(4):823-38. PubMed ID: 8980688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pair stochastic tree adjoining grammars for aligning and predicting pseudoknot RNA structures. Matsui H; Sato K; Sakakibara Y Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():290-9. PubMed ID: 16448022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Contact prediction is hardest for the most informative contacts, but improves with the incorporation of contact potentials. Holland J; Pan Q; Grigoryan G PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199585. PubMed ID: 29953468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction of beta-turns at over 80% accuracy based on an ensemble of predicted secondary structures and multiple alignments. Zheng C; Kurgan L BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():430. PubMed ID: 18847492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. Jones DT J Mol Biol; 1999 Apr; 287(4):797-815. PubMed ID: 10191147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. DECIPHER: harnessing local sequence context to improve protein multiple sequence alignment. Wright ES BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():322. PubMed ID: 26445311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Residue-residue contact substitution probabilities derived from aligned three-dimensional structures and the identification of common folds. Rodionov MA; Johnson MS Protein Sci; 1994 Dec; 3(12):2366-77. PubMed ID: 7756991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Contact pair dynamics during folding of two small proteins: chicken villin head piece and the Alzheimer protein beta-amyloid. Mukherjee A; Bagchi B J Chem Phys; 2004 Jan; 120(3):1602-12. PubMed ID: 15268287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Towards an automatic method of predicting protein structure by homology: an evaluation of suboptimal sequence alignments. Saqi MA; Bates PA; Sternberg MJ Protein Eng; 1992 Jun; 5(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1409552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Protein sequence threading: Averaging over structures. Russell AJ; Torda AE Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 12001228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]