238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8961422)
1. QALYS and ethics: a health economist's perspective.
Williams A
Soc Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 43(12):1795-804. PubMed ID: 8961422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economics, QALYs and medical ethics--a health economist's perspective.
Williams A
Health Care Anal; 1995 Aug; 3(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10151641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. QALYs: are they enough? A health economist's perspective.
Mooney G
J Med Ethics; 1989 Sep; 15(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 2521138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The principle of QALY maximisation as the basis for allocating health care resources.
Cubbon J
J Med Ethics; 1991 Dec; 17(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 1787516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QALYs, age and fairness.
Kappel K; Sandøe P
Bioethics; 1992 Oct; 6(4):297-316. PubMed ID: 11652092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equity, health, care and values: an economist's perspective.
Zamagni S
Dolentium Hominum; 1995; 10(1):203-9. PubMed ID: 15839021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation.
Singer P; McKie J; Kuhse H; Richardson J
J Med Ethics; 1995 Jun; 21(3):144-50. PubMed ID: 7674278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics and resource allocation: an economist's view.
McGuire A
Soc Sci Med; 1986; 22(11):1167-74. PubMed ID: 3092362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rationing, barbarity and the economist's perspective.
Loughlin M
Health Care Anal; 1996 May; 4(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 10162767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.
New B
BMJ; 1996 Jun; 312(7046):1593-601. PubMed ID: 8664673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priority setting in purchasing.
Carroll G
Br J Hosp Med; 1993 Feb 3-16; 49(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 8439788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptable health and priority weighting: Discussing a reference-level approach using sufficientarian reasoning.
Wouters S; van Exel NJA; Rohde KIM; Vromen JJ; Brouwer WBF
Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():158-167. PubMed ID: 28402905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality-adjusted life years and the ethical values of health care.
Dougherty CJ
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Feb; 73(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 8305185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism.
Herlitz A
J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 28993423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What do district health planners in Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability for reasonableness'?
Mshana S; Shemilu H; Ndawi B; Momburi R; Olsen OE; Byskov J; Martin DK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Nov; 7():180. PubMed ID: 17997824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers.
Martin DK; Giacomini M; Singer PA
Health Policy; 2002 Sep; 61(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 12098521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of health economics in clinical decision-making: is it ethical?
Williams A
Respir Med; 1991 Sep; 85 Suppl B():3-5. PubMed ID: 1759019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues in healthcare prioritization: a medical viewpoint.
Asplund K
Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76 Suppl 2():49-54. PubMed ID: 8535754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preferences, needs and QALYs.
Cohen J
J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):267-72. PubMed ID: 8910777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
