These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8961578)

  • 1. Measuring healing in leg ulcers: practice considerations.
    Johnson M; Miller R
    Appl Nurs Res; 1996 Nov; 9(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8961578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
    Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wound assessment: measuring the area of a leg ulcer.
    Charles H
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Jul 9-22; 7(13):765-8, 770, 772. PubMed ID: 9732568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-layer bandaging and healing rates of venous leg ulcers.
    Thomson B; Hooper P; Powell R; Warin AP
    J Wound Care; 1996 May; 5(5):213-6. PubMed ID: 8850904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the measurement of four wound variables in elderly patients with pressure ulcers.
    Schubert V; Zander M
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 9069740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques.
    Bulstrode CJ; Goode AW; Scott PJ
    Clin Sci (Lond); 1986 Oct; 71(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 3530613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
    Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Wound Trend Scale: A Retrospective Review of Utility and Predictive Value in the Assessment and Documentation of Lower Leg Ulcers.
    Campbell NA; Campbell DL; Turner A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):40-53. PubMed ID: 28054925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two devices for wound measurement.
    Liskay AM; Mion LC; Davis BR
    Dermatol Nurs; 1993 Dec; 5(6):437-41, 434. PubMed ID: 8274351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.
    Little C; McDonald J; Jenkins MG; McCarron P
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jun; 18(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 19661849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Leg ulcers: a practical approach to the leg ulcer patient.
    Ennis WJ; Meneses P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Aug; 41(7A Suppl):52S-62S; discussion 63S. PubMed ID: 7669200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
    Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.