These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8962104)

  • 1. The shape of female mating preferences.
    Ritchie MG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Dec; 93(25):14628-31. PubMed ID: 8962104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.
    Svensson EI; Runemark A; Verzijden MN; Wellenreuther M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25377451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise affects the shape of female preference functions for acoustic signals.
    Reichert MS; Ronacher B
    Evolution; 2015 Feb; 69(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 25546134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system.
    Ritchie MG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Feb; 267(1441):327-32. PubMed ID: 10722212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.
    Rodríguez RL; Boughman JW; Gray DA; Hebets EA; Höbel G; Symes LB
    Ecol Lett; 2013 Aug; 16(8):964-74. PubMed ID: 23809185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.
    Rodríguez RL; Ramaswamy K; Cocroft RB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1601):2585-93. PubMed ID: 17002943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ontogenetic shifts in male mating preference and morph-specific polyandry in a female colour polymorphic insect.
    Sánchez-Guillén RA; Hammers M; Hansson B; Van Gossum H; Cordero-Rivera A; Galicia Mendoza DI; Wellenreuther M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Jun; 13():116. PubMed ID: 23742182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jun; 274(1616):1395-402. PubMed ID: 17374595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets.
    Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1303-12. PubMed ID: 11005297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between a combinatorial processing rule and a continuous mate preference function in an insect.
    Desjonquères C; Holt RR; Speck B; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Sep; 287(1935):20201278. PubMed ID: 32933444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speciation is not necessarily easier in species with sexually monomorphic mating signals.
    Noh S; Henry CS
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1925-39. PubMed ID: 26230311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms of Assortative Mating in Speciation with Gene Flow: Connecting Theory and Empirical Research.
    Kopp M; Servedio MR; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ; Rodríguez RL; Hauber ME; Scordato EC; Symes LB; Balakrishnan CN; Zonana DM; van Doorn GS
    Am Nat; 2018 Jan; 191(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 29244561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coevolution of male mating signal and female preference during early lineage divergence of the Hawaiian cricket, Laupala cerasina.
    Grace JL; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2184-96. PubMed ID: 21790568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local population density and group composition influence the signal-preference relationship in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Fowler-Finn KD; Cruz DC; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 27749022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.