These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8962450)

  • 41. Assessing inter-rater reliability when the raters are fixed: Two concepts and two estimates.
    Rousson V
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):477-90. PubMed ID: 21425184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data.
    Donner A; Koval JJ
    Biometrics; 1980 Mar; 36(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7370372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of two indices for the intraclass correlation coefficient.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1212-23. PubMed ID: 22396135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A note on the operating characteristics of the modified F test.
    Blair RC; Sawilowsky S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):935-9. PubMed ID: 8241380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
    Lin LI
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 2720055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simultaneous confidence intervals for a success probability and intraclass correlation, with an application to screening mammography.
    Kim J; Lee JH
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):944-54. PubMed ID: 24115052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A generalized non-iterative approach to the analysis of family data.
    Eliasziw M; Donner A
    Ann Hum Genet; 1991 Jan; 55(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 2042938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements.
    Barnhart HX; Haber MJ; Lin LI
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):529-69. PubMed ID: 17613641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Point estimation following group sequential tests.
    Kim K
    Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):613-7. PubMed ID: 2765641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comment on Quan and Shih's "Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with random effects models".
    Giraudeau B; Ravaud P; Chastang C
    Biometrics; 2000 Mar; 56(1):301-2. PubMed ID: 10783810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions.
    Grassano L; Pagana G; Daperno M; Bibbona E; Gasparini M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 29110316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from models of matched binary responses.
    Shoukri MM; Martin SW; Mian IU
    Stat Med; 1995 Jan; 14(1):83-99. PubMed ID: 7701160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interval estimation and optimal design for the within-subject coefficient of variation for continuous and binary variables.
    Shoukri MM; Elkum N; Walter SD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():24. PubMed ID: 16686943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of two dependent within subject coefficients of variation to evaluate the reproducibility of measurement devices.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Kaya N; Donner A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Apr; 8():24. PubMed ID: 18430244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Issues of cost and efficiency in the design of reliability studies.
    Shoukri MM; Asyali MH; Walter SD
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1107-12. PubMed ID: 14969491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of local influence for the analysis of agreement.
    Leal C; Galea M; Osorio F
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):955-972. PubMed ID: 30768743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):849-58. PubMed ID: 14969463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing individual agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS; Haber MJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):697-719. PubMed ID: 17613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
    Vexler A; Liu A; Eliseeva E; Schisterman EF
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):895-903. PubMed ID: 18047527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.