These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8962466)

  • 1. Test of homogeneity.
    Li BY
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1521-3. PubMed ID: 8962466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on comparing growth rates of animals between groups.
    Brown GH; Donnelly JB
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):985-93. PubMed ID: 3233261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical analysis of L-tuple frequencies in eubacteria and organelles.
    Sitnikova TL; Zharkikh AA
    Biosystems; 1993; 30(1-3):113-35. PubMed ID: 8374071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of 2 related random samples: predictive test and Wilcoxon predictive range test].
    Bräuer D
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1988; 82(18):869-70. PubMed ID: 3213083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on permutation tests for variance components in multilevel generalized linear mixed models.
    Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):942-6. PubMed ID: 17403100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple comparisons between two groups on multiple Bernoulli outcomes while accounting for covariates.
    Troendle JF
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3581-91. PubMed ID: 15977268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of R(2) statistics for logistic regression.
    Hu B; Palta M; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 16059870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On identification of the number of best treatments using the Newman-Keuls test.
    Wu SS; Wang W; Annis DH
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):861-9. PubMed ID: 18932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach to a logistic regression model with incomplete information.
    Choi T; Schervish MJ; Schmitt KA; Small MJ
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):424-30. PubMed ID: 17764482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation for individual categories in cumulative logit models.
    Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4150-62. PubMed ID: 17357993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing for ordered group effects in binary and continuous outcomes.
    Farrell PJ; Park CG
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):585-98. PubMed ID: 17634976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The analysis of profile data--revisited.
    Geisser S
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3337-46. PubMed ID: 14566918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutation model for nucleotide sequences based on crystal basis.
    Minichini C; Sciarrino A
    Biosystems; 2006 Jun; 84(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 16387418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of extensions of bivariate rank sum statistics to the crossover design to compare two treatments through four sequence groups.
    Kawaguchi A; Koch GG; Ramaswamy R
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):979-88. PubMed ID: 19173698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Laird NM; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 9544513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic DNA and bioinformatics.
    Bianchi L; Liò P
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 17384432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.