These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8962516)

  • 1. A semiparametric approach to risk assessment for quantitative outcomes.
    Bosch RJ; Wypij D; Ryan LM
    Risk Anal; 1996 Oct; 16(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 8962516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of methods of benchmark-dose estimation for continuous response data.
    West RW; Kodell RL
    Risk Anal; 1999 Jun; 19(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 10765417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper confidence limits on excess risk for quantitative responses.
    Kodell RL; West RW
    Risk Anal; 1993 Apr; 13(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8502790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.
    Shipp AM; Gentry PR; Lawrence G; Van Landingham C; Covington T; Clewell HJ; Gribben K; Crump K
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2000 Nov; 16(9-10):335-438. PubMed ID: 11762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmark dose calculation for ordered categorical responses.
    Chen CC; Chen JJ
    Risk Anal; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1435-47. PubMed ID: 24444309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A probabilistic framework for non-cancer risk assessment.
    Chen JJ; Moon H; Kodell RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jun; 48(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17166641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approach for modeling noncancer dose responses with an emphasis on uncertainty.
    Price PS; Keenan RE; Swartout JC; Gillis CA; Carlson-Lynch H; Dourson ML
    Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 9323872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interspecies extrapolation in environmental exposure standard setting: A Bayesian synthesis approach.
    Jones DR; Peters JL; Rushton L; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Apr; 53(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 19545504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical dose-response modeling for high-throughput toxicity screening of environmental chemicals.
    Wilson A; Reif DM; Reich BJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 24397816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A global human health risk assessment for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D
    Gentry R; Franzen A; Van Landingham C; Greene T; Plotzke K
    Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 279 Suppl 1():23-41. PubMed ID: 28522410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment.
    Verdonck F; Janssen C; Thas O; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 15954257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health risk characterization of chlorpyrifos using epidemiological dose-response data and probabilistic techniques: a case study with rice farmers in Vietnam.
    Phung DT; Connell D; Yu Q; Chu C
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1596-607. PubMed ID: 23469779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model averaging using fractional polynomials to estimate a safe level of exposure.
    Faes C; Aerts M; Geys H; Molenberghs G
    Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 17362404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of out-of-field dose distribution in carbon-ion radiotherapy by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Yonai S; Matsufuji N; Namba M
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5028-39. PubMed ID: 22894428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing effects of PCB exposure on American mink (Mustela vison) abundance in Portland Harbor.
    Luxon M; Toll J; Hanson C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 24376109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.
    Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.