These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8962543)

  • 21. An alertness decrement hypothesis of response inhibition to repeatedly presented stimuli.
    Cecil LS; Kraut AG; Smothergill DW
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 6496810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural substrates of phasic alertness: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Yanaka HT; Saito DN; Uchiyama Y; Sadato N
    Neurosci Res; 2010 Sep; 68(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 20561955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Appearance of two-level CNV and extrication wave and the explanation of psychological factors of CNV.
    Wei JH; Zheng LX
    Int J Neurosci; 1987 Feb; 32(3-4):747-56. PubMed ID: 3596920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stimulus array onset as a preparatory signal in attentional selection.
    Rodway P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Apr; 98(2):599-614. PubMed ID: 15141926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of auditory or visual warning on visual reaction time with variations of subjects' alertness.
    Letourneau JE; Denis R; Londorf D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):667-74. PubMed ID: 3503281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Notebaert W; Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Nov; 120(3):307-26. PubMed ID: 15993830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force.
    Jaskowski P; Verleger R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Aug; 77(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 8367234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of advance information for motor preparation in Parkinson's disease: effects of cueing and compatibility between warning and imperative stimuli.
    Gueye L; Viallet F; Legallet E; Trouche E
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Oct; 38(1):66-86. PubMed ID: 9735179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of sleep deficit, knowledge of results, and stimulus quality on reaction time and response force.
    Jaśkowski P; Włodarczyk D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Apr; 84(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 9106849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of small doses of alcohol and signal intensity on simple auditory reaction time in a monotonous test situation.
    Gustafson R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Oct; 63(2 Pt 1):539-43. PubMed ID: 3774460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relative contribution of expectancy and immediate arousal to the facilitatory effect of an auditory accessory stimulus.
    Del-Fava F; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Aug; 37(8):1161-74. PubMed ID: 15273817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction tasks: further studies on immediate arousal.
    Keuss PJ; van der Molen MW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Nov; 52(1-2):61-72. PubMed ID: 7164848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A psychophysiological evaluation of the perceived urgency of auditory warning signals.
    Burt JL; Bartolome DS; Burdette DW; Comstock JR
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2327-40. PubMed ID: 7498191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force.
    Ulrich R; Rinkenauer G; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):915-28. PubMed ID: 9627425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Programming of time-to-peak force for brief isometric force pulses: effects on reaction time.
    Schröter H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jul; 59(7):1277-305. PubMed ID: 16769625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task.
    Jaśkowski P; Wróblewski M; Hojan-Jezierska D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):995-1002. PubMed ID: 7870525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Constant vs variable stimulus intensity and visual simple reaction time.
    Niemi P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):615-9. PubMed ID: 7312547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observation of response strategies in cycling time trials.
    DeFrancesco C; DeSario LF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Aug; 81(1):299-304. PubMed ID: 8532470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.