These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963048)

  • 21. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
    Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation.
    Krinsky G; Rofsky NM; Weinreb JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 8623620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation].
    Kawashima H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 56(7):459-69. PubMed ID: 8692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy revisited: MR imaging findings before and after infusion of contrast material.
    Schweitzer ME; Mandel S; Schwartzman RJ; Knobler RL; Tahmoush AJ
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):211-4. PubMed ID: 7892471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normal ovaries and functional cysts: MR appearance.
    Outwater EK; Mitchell DG
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 8596839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Femoral head perfusion and composition: MR imaging and spectroscopic evaluation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and at risk for avascular necrosis.
    Bluemke DA; Petri M; Zerhouni EA
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 7480688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.
    Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne HE; Kvinnsland S; Haugen OA; Rinck PA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 8061451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Myoepithelial lesions of the breast: imaging characteristics and diagnosis with large-core needle biopsy in two cases.
    Doyle AJ; Alder SL; Rohr LR
    Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):787-8. PubMed ID: 7972825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast.
    Rubens D; Totterman S; Chacko AK; Kothari K; Logan-Young W; Szumowski J; Simon JH; Zachariah E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Aug; 157(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 1853803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnetization transfer contrast in gadopentetate-dimeglumine-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging at 0.1 Tesla.
    Dean KI; Komu M; Dean PB; Kormano M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jun; 29 Suppl 2():S302-3. PubMed ID: 7928264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sonography of fat necrosis of the breast: correlation with mammography and MR imaging.
    Atasoy MM; Oren NC; Ilica AT; Güvenç İ; Günal A; Mossa-Basha M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Sep; 41(7):415-23. PubMed ID: 23712620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Dynamic MR mammography: is the course of signal intensification suitable for the differentiation of different forms of mastopathy?].
    Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Lebeau A; Kohnert M; Untch M; Bohmert H; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Jul; 165(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 8765364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hickman PF; Moore NR; Shepstone BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):14-20. PubMed ID: 8298869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MR imaging of myositis ossificans: variable patterns at different stages.
    Shirkhoda A; Armin AR; Bis KG; Makris J; Irwin RB; Shetty AN
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 7633105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
    Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imaging of fat-containing lesions of the breast: a pictorial essay.
    Ayyappan AP; Crystal P; Torabi A; Foley BJ; Fornage BD
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Sep; 41(7):424-33. PubMed ID: 23836049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of MRI in silicone granuloma of the breast.
    Helbich TH; Wunderbaldinger P; Plenk H; Deutinger M; Breitenseher M; Mostbeck GH
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 9097058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors and tumor mimickers with intravenous gadolinium: experience with 242 patients.
    May DA; Good RB; Smith DK; Parsons TW
    Skeletal Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 9040136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
    Cohen EK; Leonhardt CM; Shumak RS; Soutar IC; Bukhanov K; Fishell EK; Plewes DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.