These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963140)

  • 1. [Variability of findings in light sense and ring perimetry].
    Littan T; Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 8963140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Octopus perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic diseases. A contribution to the problem of optimal program choice based on 427 cases].
    Graf M; Meienberg O
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Jun; 198(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 1895723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of blue-on-yellow visual fields with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements.
    Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A; Läärä E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Nov; 38(12):2452-9. PubMed ID: 9375562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of tendency-oriented perimetry and dynamic strategy in octopus perimetry as a screening tool in a clinical setting: a prospective study.
    Scherrer M; Fleischhauer JC; Helbig H; Johann Auf der Heide K; Sutter FK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 17458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Objective assessment of visual field defects using multifocal electroretinography].
    Kretschmann U; Gendo K; Wilhelm H; Schiefer U; Hettesheimer H; Zrenner E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jan; 212(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 9541894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth.
    Bhatti MT; Holt JL; Slavin M
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2005; 50(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 15749310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multifocal visual evoked potential, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical loss of vision.
    Hedges TR; Quireza ML
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2004 Mar; 17(1):89-105. PubMed ID: 15102515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of retinal abnormalities on the multifocal visual evoked potential.
    Chen JY; Hood DC; Odel JG; Behrens MM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4378-85. PubMed ID: 17003429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Current morphofunctional studies of the optic nerve and retina in difficult diagnostic cases].
    Sheremet NL; Ronzina IA; Galoian NS; Kazarian EE
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2010; 126(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 20608189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional correlation of structure and function in glaucoma, using the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, and visual fields.
    Danesh-Meyer HV; Ku JY; Papchenko TL; Jayasundera T; Hsiang JC; Gamble GD
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 16483660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Modified technics for the examination of the central visual field].
    Richard G
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 2376381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
    Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.