These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963141)
1. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients]. Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results]. Zulauf M; Caprioli J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer]. Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry. Weber J; Klimaschka T Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7612076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter]. Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients. King AJ; Taguri A; Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Number of stimuli as a reliability parameter in perimetry. Zulauf M; Caprioli J; Boeglin RJ; Lee M Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 1477631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Hutchings N; Hosking SL; Wild JM; Flanagan JG Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Sep; 42(10):2332-7. PubMed ID: 11527947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the Humphrey perimetry programs SITA Standard and SITA Fast in normal probands and patients with glaucoma]. Nordmann JP; Brion F; Hamard P; Mouton-Chopin D J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Oct; 21(8):549-54. PubMed ID: 9833219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters. Brenton RS; Argus WA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 May; 28(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 3570687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas. de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The long-term fluctuation of the visual field in stable glaucoma. Hutchings N; Wild JM; Hussey MK; Flanagan JG; Trope GE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3429-36. PubMed ID: 11006235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients. Hong S; Chung W; Hong YJ; Seong GJ Ophthalmologica; 2007; 221(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 17440283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]