These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963141)

  • 61. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Documentation of glaucomatous visual field defects in threshold and suprathreshold perimetry].
    Stark H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Mar; 200(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 1578877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. What do glaucomatous visual fields really look like in fine-grid computerized profile perimetry?
    Stürmer J
    Dev Ophthalmol; 1985; 12():1-47. PubMed ID: 3839759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Glass E; Schaumberger M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [A new strategy for automated static perimetry].
    Weber J
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 2323694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Application of octopus 101 GKP kinetic and static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of the primary open angle glaucoma].
    Zhong Y; Shi W; Zhao P; Ai FR; Wang RY
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Jun; 29(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 17633473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparison of three methods for abbreviating G1 examinations.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1989; 33(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 2677457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].
    Grehn F; Burkard G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Nov; 193(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 3210646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of Size Modulation Standard Automated Perimetry and Conventional Standard Automated Perimetry with a 10-2 Test Program in Glaucoma Patients.
    Hirasawa K; Takahashi N; Satou T; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Aug; 42(8):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 28441081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
    Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Statistical analysis of visual fields by the automatic perimeter Octopus 2000 R with the Delta program].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(8-9):541-8. PubMed ID: 3841358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 2318590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A comparison of eight test location configurations for estimating G1 mean defect values.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1989; 33(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 2677458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients.
    Werner EB; Petrig B; Krupin T; Bishop KI
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Jun; 30(6):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2732022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of Test Strategy on Octopus Perimeter Cluster Mean Defect Values: Adaptive Bracketing Normal Strategy Versus Tendency-oriented Perimetry.
    Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):830-834. PubMed ID: 27300642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Glaucomatous visual fields: observation of development with the Octopus automatic perimeter (author's transl)].
    Gloor B; Fässler A; Lüdin B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Dec; 177(6):748-52. PubMed ID: 7206564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Progression of glaucomatous visual field damage--a clinical study with the Delta program of the Octopus Perimeter 201 in assessing the effect of early damage on visual field loss in glaucoma simplex].
    Gramer E; Althaus G
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988; 85(6):620-5. PubMed ID: 3220373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.