These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963142)

  • 1. [Age-adjusted normal values with the Tübingen Automatic Perimeter TAP 2000 CC].
    Wohlrab TM; Erb C; Rohrbach JM; Thiel HJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 8963142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-corrected normal values for perimetry.
    Wohlrab TM; Erb C; Rohrbach JM
    Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11919433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Threshold-oriented suprathreshold perimetry and threshold value perimetry with the Tübigen CC Automated Perimeter. A comparative study].
    Wohlrab TM; Kreinberger H; Erb C; Stübiger N; Dorner-schandl F; Thiel HJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1998 Feb; 95(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 9545786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measuring the optic papilla with planimetry and the optic nerve head analyzer in glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. II. Correlations of the results of both methods with changes in the visual field, studied with the Octopus automatic perimeter].
    Stürmer J; Schaer-Stoller F; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Mar; 196(3):132-42. PubMed ID: 2342313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of local differential luminance sensitivity (dls) between Oculus Twinfield Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer 630 (HFA I) in normal volunteers of varying ages].
    Lorch L; Dietrich TJ; Schwabe R; Schiefer U
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Dec; 218(12):782-94. PubMed ID: 11805870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer.
    Brenton RS; Phelps CD
    Ophthalmologica; 1986; 193(1-2):56-74. PubMed ID: 3822395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.