These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963142)

  • 41. [Automatic static quantitative perimetry of the central 30 degrees visual field in normal subjects].
    Huang YF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 2507260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
    Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Detection of retinal visual field defects by sectorial photic stimulation in scotopic luminance ERG].
    Knigge H; Heider W; Baier M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 1855744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1.
    Midena E; Vujosevic S; Cavarzeran F;
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1571-6, 1576.e1. PubMed ID: 20472294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual field (Octopus 1-2-3) in normal subjects divided into homogeneous age-groups.
    Calixto N; Santos RM; Cronemberger S
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 17187126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Multifocal steady-state pattern-reversal electroretinography in glaucoma patients].
    Lindenberg T; Horn FK; Korth M
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 12820012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities.
    Hart WM; Silverman SE; Trick GL; Nesher R; Gordon MO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 31(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 2303333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1. I. Differential light sensitivity at individual test locations.
    Zulauf M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 Sep; 232(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 7959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [New diagnostic aids in automatic perimetry].
    Weber J; Papoulis C; Schmitz A
    Ophthalmologe; 1993 Apr; 90(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 8490291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Associating the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) with visual field indices in glaucoma patients.
    Schiefer U; Dietzsch J; Dietz K; Wilhelm B; Bruckmann A; Wilhelm H; Kitiratschky V; Januschowski K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 22328816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Glaucomatous visual field defects in patients with migraine.
    Comoğlu S; Yarangümeli A; Köz OG; Elhan AH; Kural G
    J Neurol; 2003 Feb; 250(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 12574951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Data bank for analysis of the normal visual field using the 30/1 central program of the automated Humphrey perimeter].
    Béchetoille A; Dykman P; Muratet JY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1986; 9(12):837-41. PubMed ID: 3571842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA; Fingeret M; Keltner JL; Spry PG; Wall M; Werner JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15790927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter.
    Flammer J; Drance SM; Jenni A; Bebie H
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 18(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 6688197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1. II. Global visual field indices.
    Zulauf M; LeBlanc RP; Flammer J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 Sep; 232(9):516-22. PubMed ID: 7959089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A visual field quantification system for the Goldmann Perimeter.
    Odaka T; Fujisawa K; Akazawa K; Sakamoto M; Kinukawa N; Kamakura T; Nishioka Y; Itasaka H; Watanabe Y; Nose Y
    J Med Syst; 1992 Aug; 16(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 1460401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Visual field changes in mesopic and scotopic conditions using Friedmann visual field analyser. I. Normal values].
    Hara T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 May; 83(5):380-5. PubMed ID: 474312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.