These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8963383)

  • 1. Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Reed JE
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 8963383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology: challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology.
    Bigler ED
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 22(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 17194563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on "A motion to exclude and the 'fixed' versus 'flexible' battery in 'forensic' neuropsychology".
    Russell EW
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Aug; 22(6):787-90. PubMed ID: 17630247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
    Schofferman J
    Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capillary electrophoresis in court: the landmark decision of the People of Tennessee versus Ware.
    Marchi E; Pasacreta RJ
    J Capillary Electrophor; 1997; 4(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 9627830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for neuropsychological impairment in children using Reitan and Wolfson's preliminary neuropsychological test battery.
    Vanderslice-Barr JL; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 May; 23(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 18343088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dentist as expert witness.
    Meckler M
    Dent Clin North Am; 1982 Apr; 26(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 6950915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.
    Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries.
    Russell EW; Russell SL; Hill BD
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 20(6):785-94. PubMed ID: 15935610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states.
    Keierleber JA; Bohan TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1154-63. PubMed ID: 16225224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.