These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8964783)
21. [Fluid studies on flow behaviour in narrowing vessels with PC-velocimetry and numerical simulations]. Lehmpfuhl M; Hao C; Martirosian P; Schick F Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Feb; 54(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 19182872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Numerical simulations of phase contrast velocity mapping of complex flows in an anatomically realistic bypass graft geometry. Lee KL; Doorly DJ; Firmin DN Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2621-31. PubMed ID: 16898466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Convex gradient optimization for increased spatiotemporal resolution and improved accuracy in phase contrast MRI. Middione MJ; Wu HH; Ennis DB Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1552-64. PubMed ID: 24347040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ultrafast flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Zhang H; Halliburton SS; Moore JR; Simonetti OP; Schvartzman PR; White RD; Chatzimavroudis GP Ann Biomed Eng; 2002 Jan; 30(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 11874135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mapping mean and fluctuating velocities by Bayesian multipoint MR velocity encoding-validation against 3D particle tracking velocimetry. Knobloch V; Binter C; Gülan U; Sigfridsson A; Holzner M; Lüthi B; Kozerke S Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1405-15. PubMed ID: 23670993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multiscale flow patterns within an intracranial aneurysm phantom. Marquering HA; van Ooij P; Streekstra GJ; Schneiders JJ; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Dec; 58(12):3447-50. PubMed ID: 21803678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro validation of flow measurement with phase contrast MRI at 3 tesla using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry-based computational fluid dynamics. Khodarahmi I; Shakeri M; Kotys-Traughber M; Fischer S; Sharp MK; Amini AA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 24123721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Blood flow dynamics in the vertebrobasilar system: correlation of a transparent elastic model and MR angiography. Chong BW; Kerber CW; Buxton RB; Frank LR; Hesselink JR AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Apr; 15(4):733-45. PubMed ID: 8010277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correction of partial volume inaccuracies in quantitative phase contrast MR angiography. Hamilton CA Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(7):1127-30. PubMed ID: 7997100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation. Arzani A; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Shadden SC Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 40(4):860-70. PubMed ID: 22016327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Flow MRI simulation in complex 3D geometries: Application to the cerebral venous network. Fortin A; Salmon S; Baruthio J; Delbany M; Durand E Magn Reson Med; 2018 Oct; 80(4):1655-1665. PubMed ID: 29405357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow. Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Gårdhagen R; Karlsson M; Ebbers T Magn Reson Med; 2010 Oct; 64(4):1039-46. PubMed ID: 20574963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound imaging velocimetry: effect of beam sweeping on velocity estimation. Zhou B; Fraser KH; Poelma C; Mari JM; Eckersley RJ; Weinberg PD; Tang MX Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1672-81. PubMed ID: 23791353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Haemodynamics and blood flow measured using ultrasound imaging. Hoskins PR Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 20349818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo velocity and flow errors quantification by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Pibarot P Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1377-80. PubMed ID: 19162924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Echo Particle Image Velocimetry for Estimation of Carotid Artery Wall Shear Stress: Repeatability, Reproducibility and Comparison with Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Gurung A; Gates PE; Mazzaro L; Fulford J; Zhang F; Barker AJ; Hertzberg J; Aizawa K; Strain WD; Elyas S; Shore AC; Shandas R Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1618-1627. PubMed ID: 28501327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Turbine flow sensor for volume-flow rate verification in MR. Frayne R; Holdsworth DW; Smith RF; Kasrai R; Larsen JP; Rutt BK Magn Reson Med; 1994 Sep; 32(3):410-7. PubMed ID: 7984075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]