BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8965215)

  • 1. How to be an effective risk communicator.
    Donohoe KJ; Brill AB; Brill DR; Conway JJ; Silberstein EB; Whipple C
    J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 37(7):20N-22N. PubMed ID: 8965215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a holistic approach in the presentation of benefits and risks of medical radiation.
    Wagner LK
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 21979542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [From knowledge about risk to the regulation of exposures to ionizing radiation].
    Masse R; Pasquier JL
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1997; 191(5-6):797-806. PubMed ID: 9587486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Key sources of imprecision in radiological emergency response assessments.
    Haywood SM
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 18495989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risks to Ireland from incidents at Sellafield.
    Hone C
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):247-9. PubMed ID: 23455004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External dosimetry in the aftermath of a radiological terrorist event.
    Klemic GA; Bailey PD; Miller KM; Monetti MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16606662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A personal experience reducing radiation exposures: protecting family in Kiev during the first two weeks after Chernobyl.
    Eremenko VA; Droppo JG
    Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2 Suppl):S39-46. PubMed ID: 16823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unnecessary imaging and radiation risk: the perfect storm for radiologists.
    Cascade PN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):709-11. PubMed ID: 17411687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Iodine prophylaxis to prevent radiation damage following nuclear disasters].
    Frankfort SV; Roos JC; Franssen EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(34):1641-4. PubMed ID: 12966630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methodological principles for using agents for the mass prevention of the sequelae of human irradiation].
    Shandala NK
    Gig Sanit; 1999; (2):33-7. PubMed ID: 10349237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation.
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010; 29 Suppl 1():36-7. PubMed ID: 21235077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [What is risk management?].
    Nagata Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Oct; 65(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 16334385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Socio-psychological and ecological aspects within the system of nuclear radiation risk mitigation].
    Davydov BI; Ushakov IB; Zuev VG
    Aviakosm Ekolog Med; 2004; 38(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 15500167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. With skill and safety.
    Borgstede JP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):717-8. PubMed ID: 17411915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The radiation hazard--let's put it in perspective.
    Gray JE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1979 Dec; 54(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 513846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ALARA principle in the context of a radiological or nuclear emergency.
    Musolino SV; DeFranco J; Schlueck R
    Health Phys; 2008 Feb; 94(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 18188044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.
    Andersson KG; Mikkelsen T; Astrup P; Thykier-Nielsen S; Jacobsen LH; Schou-Jensen L; Hoe SC; Nielsen SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 18550515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose assessment for reentry or reoccupancy and recovery of urban areas contaminated by a radiological dispersal device: the need for a consensus approach.
    Sullivan T; Musolino SV; DeFranco J
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 18403962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk: a media perspective.
    Edwards R
    J Radiol Prot; 1999 Mar; 19(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.