These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8965215)

  • 21. The radioactive autopsy: safe working practices.
    Singleton M; Start RD; Tindale W; Richardson C; Conway M
    Histopathology; 2007 Sep; 51(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 17645747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Basic concepts and examples of effective risk communication panel summary: getting the message out.
    Locke PA
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):539. PubMed ID: 21979535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risks from nuclear accidents are still uncertain.
    Loomis D
    Occup Environ Med; 2011 Jun; 68(6):387. PubMed ID: 21565863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Waste disposal and the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection - challenges for radioecology and environmental radiation protection.
    Larsson CM
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1053-7. PubMed ID: 19643515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation protection. Protection from potential exposures: application to selected radiation sources. A report of a task group of the International Commission on Radiation Protection.
    Ann ICRP; 1997; 27(2):1-61. PubMed ID: 9313827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Individuals' decisions affecting radiation exposure after a nuclear explosion.
    Florig HK; Fischhoff B
    Health Phys; 2007 May; 92(5):475-83. PubMed ID: 17429306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Health risks for the Hungarian population due to the nuclear accident in Chernobyl].
    Köteles G
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Jun; 143(23):1411-4. PubMed ID: 12132327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How to be an effective risk communicator--Part 1.
    Donohoe KJ; Brill AB; Brill DR; Conway JJ; Silberstein EB; Whipple C
    J Nucl Med; 1996 Jun; 37(6):23N-6N. PubMed ID: 8683303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science to philosophy.
    Dixon RL; Gray JE; Archer BR; Simpkin DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):16-22. PubMed ID: 16381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 1: controlling unnecessary radiation exposures.
    Strzelczyk JJ; Damilakis J; Marx MV; Macura KJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):924-31. PubMed ID: 17412203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chernobyl: poverty and stress pose 'bigger threat' than radiation.
    Stephan V
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7056):181. PubMed ID: 16148902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Radiation medicine and its significance to scientific and practical internist's activity].
    Gus'kova AK
    Klin Med (Mosk); 2006; 84(2):4-7. PubMed ID: 16612997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Medical and biological consequences of human's chronic exposure to radiation].
    Akleev AV; Preston D; Krestinina LIu
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2004; (3):30-6. PubMed ID: 15124393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Information and interaction with the public.
    Grlicarev I; Stritar A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):41-4. PubMed ID: 15238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emergency management: does it have a sufficiently comprehensive understanding of decision-making, process and context?
    Niculae C; French S; Carter E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):97-100. PubMed ID: 15238664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Iraqi looters spark alert over radiation risks.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6938):370. PubMed ID: 12761508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Epidemiological data and radiation risk estimates].
    Cardis E
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Jan; 50(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 11938114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The sequelae and problems of the Chernobyl catastrophe].
    Tsyb AF; Ivanov VK
    Voen Med Zh; 1997 Jan; 318(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 9254466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. De-fragmenting standards.
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 18718958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Critical Assessment of the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: Its Validity and Applicability for Use in Risk Assessment and Radiation Protection.
    Siegel JA; Brooks AL; Fisher DR; Zanzonico PB; Doss M; OʼConnor MK; Silberstein EB; Welsh JS; Greenspan BS
    Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 44(7):521-525. PubMed ID: 31107746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.