471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8965622)
1. [Comparison of auscultation findings using a classic stethoscope (Litmann 2120) and electronically amplified stethoscope (Medmax2)].
Lukin A; Polić S; Rumboldt Z; Bagatin J; Rakić D; Kuzmanić A
Lijec Vjesn; 1996; 118(5-6):127-8. PubMed ID: 8965622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac auscultation training of medical students: a comparison of electronic sensor-based and acoustic stethoscopes.
Høyte H; Jensen T; Gjesdal K
BMC Med Educ; 2005 May; 5(1):14. PubMed ID: 15882458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transmission of lung sounds through light clothing.
Kraman SS
Respiration; 2008; 75(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17202806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In flight auscultation: comparison of electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
Tourtier JP; Fontaine E; Coste S; Ramsang S; Schiano P; Viaggi M; Libert N; Durand X; Chargari C; Borne M
Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 29(8):932-5. PubMed ID: 20674225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simulator-based study of in-flight auscultation.
Tourtier JP; Libert N; Clapson P; Dubourdieu S; Jost D; Tazarourte K; Astaud CE; Debien B; Auroy Y
Simul Healthc; 2014 Apr; 9(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 24695079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A visual stethoscope to detect the position of the tracheal tube.
Kato H; Suzuki A; Nakajima Y; Makino H; Sanjo Y; Nakai T; Shiraishi Y; Katoh T; Sato S
Anesth Analg; 2009 Dec; 109(6):1836-42. PubMed ID: 19923511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-flight auscultation during medical air evacuation: comparison between traditional and amplified stethoscopes.
Fontaine E; Coste S; Poyat C; Klein C; Lefort H; Leclerc T; Dubourdieu S; Briche F; Jost D; Maurin O; Domanski L; Tourtier JP
Air Med J; 2014; 33(6):283-5. PubMed ID: 25441521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electronic Stethoscope Filtering Mimics the Perceived Sound Characteristics of Acoustic Stethoscope.
Rennoll V; McLane I; Emmanouilidou D; West J; Elhilali M
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 May; 25(5):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 32870803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Kalinauskienė E; Razvadauskas H; Morse DJ; Maxey GE; Naudžiūnas A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 30959832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of teaching and type of stethoscope on cardiac auscultatory performance.
Iversen K; Søgaard Teisner A; Dalsgaard M; Greibe R; Timm HB; Skovgaard LT; Hróbjartsson A; Copenhagen O; Copenhagen S; Copenhagen K
Am Heart J; 2006 Jul; 152(1):85.e1-7. PubMed ID: 16824835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of conventional and sensor-based electronic stethoscopes in detecting cardiac murmurs of dogs.
Vörös K; Bonnevie A; Reiczigel J
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2012 Apr; 40(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22526814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A fuzzy expert system design for analysis of body sounds and design of an unique electronic stethoscope (development of HILSA kit).
Kumar BH
Biosens Bioelectron; 2007 Jan; 22(6):1121-5. PubMed ID: 16735115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brief report: pulmonary auscultation in the operating room: a prospective randomized blinded trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes.
Hoffmann C; Falzone E; Verret C; Pasquier P; Leclerc T; Donat N; Jost D; Mérat S; Maurice GS; Lenoir B; Auroy Y; Tourtier JP
Anesth Analg; 2013 Sep; 117(3):646-648. PubMed ID: 23868885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Frequency analysis of crackles recorded with a stethoscope-equipped recorder].
Kiyokawa H; Yonemaru M; Horie S; Ichinose Y; Toyama K
Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1341-47. PubMed ID: 8821985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prototype electronic stethoscope vs. conventional stethoscope for auscultation of heart sounds.
Kelmenson DA; Heath JK; Ball SA; Kaafarani HM; Baker EM; Yeh DD; Bittner EA; Eikermann M; Lee J
J Med Eng Technol; 2014 Aug; 38(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 24939853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of an electronic stethoscope system for monitoring neonatal bowel sounds.
Dumas J; Hill KM; Adrezin RS; Alba J; Curry R; Campagna E; Fernandes C; Lamba V; Eisenfeld L
Conn Med; 2013 Sep; 77(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 24156174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-world evaluation of the Stemoscope electronic tele-auscultation system.
Fan M; Wang Q; Liu J; Su L; Wang B; Xu H; Li Q; Zhang Z
Biomed Eng Online; 2022 Sep; 21(1):63. PubMed ID: 36068509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auscultation in flight: comparison of conventional and electronic stethoscopes.
Tourtier JP; Libert N; Clapson P; Tazarourte K; Borne M; Grasser L; Debien B; Auroy Y
Air Med J; 2011; 30(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 21549289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the 3M Littmann Electronic Stethoscope Model 3200 in 150 cats.
Blass KA; Schober KE; Bonagura JD; Scansen BA; Visser LC; Lu J; Smith DN; Ward JL
J Feline Med Surg; 2013 Oct; 15(10):893-900. PubMed ID: 23599254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes.
Abella M; Formolo J; Penney DG
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2224-8. PubMed ID: 1597610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
