121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8966292)
1. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
Sprawls P; Kitts EL
Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
Braeuning MP; Cooper HW; O'Brien S; Burns CB; Washburn DB; Schell MJ; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
Kimme-Smith C; Sun H; Bassett LW; Gold RH
Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitometric evaluation of some mammographic film-screen combinations.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 1953502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance tests for mammographic film-screen combinations: use of absolute techniques.
Bor D; Akdur K
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 23603122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality control in mammography.
Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic film processing: analysis of 9 years of observations.
Suleiman OH; Conway BJ; Rueter FG; Slayton RJ
Radiology; 1992 Oct; 185(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 1523318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
Brink C; de Villiers JF; Lötter MG; van Zyl M
Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
Kimme-Smith C; Rothschild PA; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Moler C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
Skubic SE; Yagan R; Oravec D; Shah Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of mammographic film processor performance in a hospital and mobile screening unit.
Murray JG; Dowsett DJ; Laird O; Ennis JT
Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1097-101. PubMed ID: 1286417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography.
Hendrick RE; Berns EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
