These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8967264)
21. Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels. Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Hsu TS; Ratnam SS; Till O; Westgren M Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):803-6. PubMed ID: 1923201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin]. Bilar M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Classification of technical pitfalls in objective universal hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions, using an ARMA model of the stimulus waveform and bootstrap cross-validation. Vannier E; Avan P Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):669-77. PubMed ID: 16139764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Actifetus system: a multidoppler sensor system for monitoring fetal movements. Kribèche A; Tranquart F; Kouame D; Pourcelot L Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 17276580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children. Ugur AK; Kemaloglu YK; Ugur MB; Gunduz B; Saridogan C; Yesilkaya E; Bideci A; Cinaz P; Goksu N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):555-9. PubMed ID: 19150138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combination of vibroacoustic stimulation and acute variables of mFBP as a simple assessment method of low-risk fetuses. Petrović O; Finderle A; Prodan M; Skunca E; Prpić I; Zaputović S J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Feb; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 19253163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN; Dhawan R J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Perinatal morbidity in pregnancies of women with preconceptional and gestational diabetes mellitus in comparison with pregnancies of non-diabetic women. Results of the perinatal registry of Lower Saxony, Germany]. Günter HH; Scharf A; Hertel H; Hillemanns P; Wenzlaff P; Maul H Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Dec; 210(6):200-7. PubMed ID: 17206554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fetal acoustic stimulation as a possible adjunct to diagnostic obstetric ultrasound: a preliminary report. Sarno AP; Bruner JP Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):668-70. PubMed ID: 2216200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The temporal organization of human fetal motor function]. Bursian AV; Konstantinova NN; Natsvlishvili VV; Voskresenskiĭ VO Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1992; 28(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 1300017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A non-invasive stress test for fetal movement stimulation]. Prenzlau P; Hoffmann H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1982; 104(15):960-4. PubMed ID: 7136364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the design of time windows. Janusauskas A; Sörnmo L; Svensson O; Engdahl B IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 12066880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Physiology of intrauterine fetal activity]. Jakobovits A Orv Hetil; 2010 Feb; 151(6):205-12. PubMed ID: 20123655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ultrasound assessment of fetal hearing response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Das R; Jana N; Arora N; Sengupta S J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jul; 33(14):2326-2332. PubMed ID: 30618302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone. Smith CV; Satt B; Phelan JP; Paul RH Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 2222618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incidence of spontaneous and evoked fetal movements in the first half of twin pregnancy. Samueloff A; Younis JS; Strauss N; Baras M; Sadovsky E Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 31(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 1885087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Grasping activity in utero: a significant indicator of fetal behavior (the role of the grasping reflex in fetal ethology). Jakobovits AA J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):571-2. PubMed ID: 19492927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The quality of fetal arm movements as indicators of fetal stress. Reissland N; Francis B Early Hum Dev; 2010 Dec; 86(12):813-6. PubMed ID: 20947272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]