These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8968024)

  • 1. Bone particles disturb new bone formation on the interface of the titanium implant after reaming of the marrow cavity.
    Ishizaka M; Tanizawa T; Sofue M; Dohmae Y; Endo N; Takahashi HE
    Bone; 1996 Dec; 19(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 8968024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
    Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits.
    Suzuki K; Aoki K; Ohya K
    Bone; 1997 Dec; 21(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 9430240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
    Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.
    Feighan JE; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Parr JA; Stevenson S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1380-95. PubMed ID: 7673290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of bone around titanium implants and bioactive glass particles: an experimental study in rats.
    Gorustovich A; Rosenbusch M; Guglielmotti MB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 12381064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bone-implant interface: a dynamic surface.
    Goldberg VM; Jinno T
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 10537583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultraviolet-C irradiation to titanium implants increases peri-implant bone formation without impeding mineralization in a rabbit femur model.
    Yamazaki M; Yamada M; Ishizaki K; Sakurai K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 25645878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The early effects of intramedullary reaming of the femur on bone mineral density; an experimental study in pigs.
    Ellingsen Husebye E; Lyberg T; Madsen JE; Nordsletten L; Røise O
    Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 19919926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants.
    Franchi M; Orsini E; Trire A; Quaranta M; Martini D; Piccari GG; Ruggeri A; Ottani V
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2004 Dec; 4():1083-95. PubMed ID: 15632988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local delivery of a zoledronate solution improves osseointegration of titanium implants in a rat distal femur model.
    AbuMoussa S; Ruppert DS; Lindsay C; Dahners L; Weinhold P
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):3294-3298. PubMed ID: 30117189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
    Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vascular and structural changes in rat femora following nailing and intramedullary occlusion.
    Grundnes O; Gjerdet NR; Utvåg SE; Reikerås O
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 9671923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biologic response to titanium implants with laser-treated surfaces.
    Allegrini S; Yoshimoto M; Salles MB; de Almeida Bressiani AH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 24451855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intramedullary pressure and bone marrow fat extravasation in reamed and unreamed femoral nailing.
    Kröpfl A; Davies J; Berger U; Hertz H; Schlag G
    J Orthop Res; 1999 Mar; 17(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 10221844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition.
    Thomas KA; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Oct; 19(8):875-901. PubMed ID: 3880349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.
    Bobyn JD; Jacobs JJ; Tanzer M; Urban RM; Aribindi R; Sumner DR; Turner TM; Brooks CE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):21-39. PubMed ID: 7634577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sclerostin antibody increases bone volume and enhances implant fixation in a rat model.
    Virdi AS; Liu M; Sena K; Maletich J; McNulty M; Ke HZ; Sumner DR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(18):1670-80. PubMed ID: 22992878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.