These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8968713)
1. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives. Elston RC; Guo X; Williams LV Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):535-58. PubMed ID: 8968713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis II: including discordant relative pairs in the study. Guo X; Elston RC Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):111-27. PubMed ID: 10642425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs. Guo X; Elston RC Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linkage between quantitative trait and marker loci: methods using all relative pairs. Olson JM; Wijsman EM Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(2):87-102. PubMed ID: 8339928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Program update and novel use of the DESPAIR program to design a genome-wide linkage study using relative pairs. Ochs-Balcom HM; Guo X; Yonebayashi T; Wiesner G; Elston RC Hum Hered; 2010; 69(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 19797908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficient strategies for genome scanning using maximum-likelihood affected-sib-pair analysis. Holmans P; Craddock N Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 60(3):657-66. PubMed ID: 9042927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. Risch N Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):242-53. PubMed ID: 2301394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the total expected study cost in two-stage genome-wide search designs for linkage analysis using the mean test for affected sib pairs. Ziegler A; Böddeker I; Geller F; Müller HH; Guo X Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 11255247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Designs of reference families for the construction of genetic linkage maps. Da Y; VanRaden PM; Li N; Beattie CW; Wu C; Schook LB Anim Biotechnol; 1998; 9(3):205-28. PubMed ID: 9914814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models. Risch N Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 2301392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data. Cordell HJ; Olson JM Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal DNA pooling-based two-stage designs in case-control association studies. Zhao Y; Wang S Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18931509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On power and efficiency robust linkage tests for affected sibs. Gastwirth JL; Freidlin B Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):443-53. PubMed ID: 11281282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining extremely concordant sibpairs with extremely discordant sibpairs provides a cost effective way to linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci. Gu C; Todorov A; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):513-33. PubMed ID: 8968712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data. Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the power of affected relative pair designs for linkage studies. Li Z; Gastwirth JL Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jan; 68(Pt 1):65-8. PubMed ID: 14748831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]