These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8969803)

  • 41. Evaluation of fatigue scales in stroke patients.
    Mead G; Lynch J; Greig C; Young A; Lewis S; Sharpe M
    Stroke; 2007 Jul; 38(7):2090-5. PubMed ID: 17525397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The importance of classifications in psychiatry].
    Lempérière T
    Encephale; 1995 Dec; 21 Spec No 5():3-7. PubMed ID: 8582303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Concerns for the reliability and validity of the National Stroke Project Stroke Severity Scale.
    El Husseini N; Shea KJ; Goldstein LB
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2011; 32(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 21986552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comprehensive assessment of disability post-stroke using the newly developed miFUNCTION scale.
    Zerna C; Burley T; Green TL; Dukelow SP; Demchuk AM; Hill MD
    Int J Stroke; 2020 Feb; 15(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 30917775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reliability (inter-rater agreement) of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duffy L; Gajree S; Langhorne P; Stott DJ; Quinn TJ
    Stroke; 2013 Feb; 44(2):462-8. PubMed ID: 23299497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The reliability of stroke scales. The german version of NIHSS, ESS and Rankin scales].
    Berger K; Weltermann B; Kolominsky-Rabas P; Meves S; Heuschmann P; Böhner J; Neundörfer B; Hense HW; Büttner T
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1999 Feb; 67(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 10093781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is the Barthel Scale appropriate in non-industrialized countries? A view of rural Pakistan.
    Ali SM; Mulley GP
    Disabil Rehabil; 1998 May; 20(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 9622265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales.
    Kasner SE
    Lancet Neurol; 2006 Jul; 5(7):603-12. PubMed ID: 16781990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis.
    Banks JL; Marotta CA
    Stroke; 2007 Mar; 38(3):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17272767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reliability and Validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A Systematic Review.
    Hales M; Biros E; Reznik JE
    Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2015; 21(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 26363591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Reliability of neurological assessment scales in patients with stroke].
    de Caneda MA; Fernandes JG; de Almeida AG; Mugnol FE
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2006 Sep; 64(3A):690-7. PubMed ID: 17119821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stroke in the young: The multiethnic prospective durban stroke data bank results.
    Hoffmann M
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 1998; 7(6):404-13. PubMed ID: 17895119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients.
    Ohura T; Hase K; Nakajima Y; Nakayama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28841846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale.
    Bushnell CD; Johnston DC; Goldstein LB
    Stroke; 2001 Mar; 32(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 11239183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Quantitative scales for measuring neurological deficit in cerebrovascular diseases].
    Battista RN; Wolfson CM; Cote R; Adam J
    Epidemiol Prev; 1990 Jun; 12(43):28-31. PubMed ID: 2149106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Barthel index in a Middle-East country: translation, validity and reliability.
    Oveisgharan S; Shirani S; Ghorbani A; Soltanzade A; Baghaei A; Hosseini S; Sarrafzadegan N
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2006; 22(5-6):350-4. PubMed ID: 16888374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. White matter hyperintensities and rating scales-observer reliability varies with lesion load.
    Wardlaw JM; Ferguson KJ; Graham C
    J Neurol; 2004 May; 251(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 15164192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differences in psychometric properties, cut-off scores, and outcomes between the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in pharmacotherapy-based stroke trials: systematic literature review.
    Balu S
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1329-41. PubMed ID: 19419341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident.
    Miki E; Yamane S; Yamaoka M; Fujii H; Ueno H; Kawahara T; Tanaka K; Tamashiro H; Inoue E; Okamoto T; Kuriyama M
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2016 Sep; 23(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 26463478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel].
    Schlote A; Krüger J; Topp H; Wallesch CW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Apr; 43(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15100916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.