These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8970205)

  • 21. Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner.
    Saba K; Maxood A; Abdullah S; Riaz A; Din SU
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2018; 30(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 29938411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of dentin bonding systems used with spherical and admixed amalgams.
    Korale ME; Meiers JC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 9545878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year.
    Meiers JC; Turner EW
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9610330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH; Louka AN
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
    Morrow LA; Wilson NH; Setcos JC; Watts DC
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of a resin lining and rebonding on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Dutton FB; Summitt JB; Chan DC; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8425985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Experimental use of dentin bonding agents and a cavity varnish to reduce marginal microleakage in high copper amalgam restorations].
    Aras S; Cetiner S
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 May; 16(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 2700122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluations of the interface between amalgam and dentin with a single component dentin bonding system.
    Estafan D; Gultz J; Pines M; Scherer W
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 11199580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of cavity varnish, amalgam liner or dentin bonding agents on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Belli S; Unlü N; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 May; 28(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 11380791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An in vitro study of microleakage of occlusal composite restorations polymerized by a conventional curing light and a PAC curing light.
    Stritikus J; Owens B
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 11314147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.