These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8970800)
1. Morality and the state, law and legalism. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(6):35-7. PubMed ID: 8970800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Moral discourse, bioethics, and the law. Schneider CE Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(6):37-9. PubMed ID: 8970801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying. Robichaud TD Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine. Bloche MG N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story. Kaplan J Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond personhood and autonomy: moral theory and the premises of privacy. Rappaport AJ Utah Law Rev; 2001; 2001(2):441-507. PubMed ID: 16538746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 11644649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 11645024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 9019233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Parental notification and public policy. Diamond EF St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS; Forster HP J Clin Ethics; 1998; 9(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 10029833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The America we seek: a statement of pro-life principle and concern. Agee MC; Argue D; Arkes H First Things; 1996 May; 63():40-4. PubMed ID: 11654353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Law and medicine. Gostin LO JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(23):1866-7. PubMed ID: 9185806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Last rights? Confronting physician-assisted suicide in law and society: legal liturgies on physician-assisted suicide. Morgan RC; Sutherland DD Stetson Law Rev; 1996; 26(2):481-528. PubMed ID: 16528860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]