These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8970823)

  • 1. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 90(1-2):176-84. PubMed ID: 8974995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory nerve neurophonic tuning curves produced by masking of round window responses.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):167-76. PubMed ID: 9119760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The auditory neurophonic: basic properties.
    Snyder RL; Schreiner CE
    Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 15(3):261-80. PubMed ID: 6501114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear tuning in the gerbil: a comparison of responses to sinusoidal amplitude modulation and difference tone stimuli.
    Henry KR
    Audiology; 1998; 37(5):262-77. PubMed ID: 9776203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses of gerbil and guinea pig auditory nerve fibers to low-frequency sinusoids.
    Oshima W; Strelioff D
    Hear Res; 1983 Nov; 12(2):167-84. PubMed ID: 6643289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The envelope following response to multiple tone pair stimuli.
    Dolphin WF
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 9282884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
    Rhode WS; Greenberg S
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 71(5):1797-825. PubMed ID: 8064349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle.
    Crawford AC; Fettiplace R
    J Physiol; 1980 Sep; 306():79-125. PubMed ID: 7463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones.
    Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jul; 68(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 7391355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory neurophonic responses to amplitude-modulated tones: transfer functions and forward masking.
    Snyder RL; Schreiner CE
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 3429351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
    Cariani PA; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.
    Choudhury B; Fitzpatrick DC; Buchman CA; Wei BP; Dillon MT; He S; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23047261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.