BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8970824)

  • 1. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory nerve neurophonic produced by the frequency difference of two simultaneously presented tones.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8970823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory nerve neurophonic tuning curves produced by masking of round window responses.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):167-76. PubMed ID: 9119760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1995 Oct; 90(1-2):176-84. PubMed ID: 8974995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear tuning in the gerbil: a comparison of responses to sinusoidal amplitude modulation and difference tone stimuli.
    Henry KR
    Audiology; 1998; 37(5):262-77. PubMed ID: 9776203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The auditory neurophonic: basic properties.
    Snyder RL; Schreiner CE
    Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 15(3):261-80. PubMed ID: 6501114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory neurophonic responses to amplitude-modulated tones: transfer functions and forward masking.
    Snyder RL; Schreiner CE
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 3429351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept.
    Lichtenhan JT; Cooper NP; Guinan JJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 22874644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibres and hair cells in the cochlea of the turtle.
    Crawford AC; Fettiplace R
    J Physiol; 1980 Sep; 306():79-125. PubMed ID: 7463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal factors associated with cochlear nerve tuning to dual and single tones: a qualitative study.
    Henry KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2272-9. PubMed ID: 10491691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forward masking of the auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) and the frequency following response (FFR).
    Snyder RL; Schreiner CE
    Hear Res; 1985; 20(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 4077744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward masking and unmasking of the offset cochlear compound action potential of the gerbil: comparison with suppression areas of the onset cochlear compound action potential.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3680048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise improves transfer of near-threshold, phase-locked activity of the cochlear nerve: evidence for stochastic resonance?
    Henry KR
    J Comp Physiol A; 1999 Jun; 184(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 10418154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.
    Robles L; Ruggero MA; Rich NC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1364-74. PubMed ID: 3782615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constructing a cochlear transducer function from the summating potential using a low-frequency bias tone.
    Choi CH; Chertoff ME; Bian L; Lerner D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):2996-3007. PubMed ID: 15603145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Latency and amplitude compound action potential tuning curves for tonal stimuli with nontraditional envelopes.
    Henry KR; Sweet RJ; Szymanski MD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.