These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8971996)

  • 21. Radiological diagnosis of periapical bone tissue lesions in endodontics: a systematic review.
    Petersson A; Axelsson S; Davidson T; Frisk F; Hakeberg M; Kvist T; Norlund A; Mejàre I; Portenier I; Sandberg H; Tranaeus S; Bergenholtz G
    Int Endod J; 2012 Sep; 45(9):783-801. PubMed ID: 22429152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The detection of in vitro produced periodontal bone lesions by conventional radiography and photographic subtraction radiography using observers and quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Janssen PT; van Palenstein Helderman WH; van Aken J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Jul; 16(6):335-41. PubMed ID: 2668346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative measurement of periodontal bone changes by digital subtraction.
    Vos MH; Janssen PT; van Aken J; Heethaar RM
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Nov; 21(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 2947992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Clinical application prospect of digital subtraction technique for periapical radiographs].
    Ma X; Zhang G; Chen H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 30(6):323-5, 383. PubMed ID: 8762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Nagata Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11420624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The efficiency of instant film in periapical lesion diagnosis].
    Chongruk C; Manomaisantipab O
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1983; 33(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 6580314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A contemporary perspective on techniques for the clinical assessment of alveolar bone.
    Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1990 Mar; 61(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 2181109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 8181644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants.
    Jung YC; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):811-8. PubMed ID: 8990646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative evaluation of proximal bone lesions using digital subtraction radiography.
    Okano T; Ohki M; Mera T; Soejima H; Ishikawa I; Yamada N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1988; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 3078298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of periapical lesions.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):910-3. PubMed ID: 6588078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced osseous lesions in the human mandible].
    Badino M; Testori T; Castagnola M
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(3):79-85. PubMed ID: 1777683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Television radiographic evaluation of periapical osseous radiolucencies.
    Kasle MJ; Klein AI
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1976 Jun; 41(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 1063984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.