BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8972086)

  • 1. Microbiological contamination of ovine carcasses associated with the presence of wool and faecal material.
    Biss ME; Hathaway SC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Dec; 81(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 8972086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microbiological and Visible Contamination of Lamb Carcasses According to Preslaughter Presentation Status: Implications for HACCP.
    Hiss ME; Hathawar SC
    J Food Prot; 1995 Jul; 58(7):776-783. PubMed ID: 31137329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of pre-slaughter washing of lambs on the microbiological and visible contamination of the carcases.
    Biss ME; Hathaway SC
    Vet Rec; 1996 Jan; 138(4):82-6. PubMed ID: 8650892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distribution and sources of microbial contamination on beef carcasses.
    Bell RG
    J Appl Microbiol; 1997 Mar; 82(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 12455892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of shearing and fleece cleanliness on microbiological contamination of lamb carcasses.
    Hauge SJ; Nafstad O; Skjerve E; Røtterud OJ; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 150(2-3):178-83. PubMed ID: 21862163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zero-tolerance for faecal contamination of carcasses as a tool in the control of O157 VTEC infections.
    Heuvelink AE; Roessink GL; Bosboom K; de Boer E
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 May; 66(1-2):13-20. PubMed ID: 11407542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hygienic efficiency of conventional and inverted lamb dressing systems.
    Bell RG; Hathaway SC
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1996 Sep; 81(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 8810052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of visible faecal material as a vehicle for generic Escherichia coli, coliform, and other enterobacteria contaminating poultry carcasses during slaughtering.
    Jiménez SM; Tiburzi MC; Salsi MS; Pirovani ME; Moguilevsky MA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 95(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 12911691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of evisceration on visible contamination and the microbiological profile of fresh broiler chicken carcasses using the Nu-Tech Evisceration System or the conventional Streamlined Inspection System.
    Russell SM; Walker JM
    Poult Sci; 1997 May; 76(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9154634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance characteristics of three different pre-evisceration wash regimes applied to the forequarters of ovine carcasses in an inverted dressing system.
    Biss ME; Hathaway SC
    Meat Sci; 1994; 38(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 22059610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of control over the microbiological contamination of carcasses in a lamb carcass dressing process operated with or without pasteurizing treatment.
    Milios K; Mataragas M; Pantouvakis A; Drosinos EH; Zoiopoulos PE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 21406314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of hygienic treatments during slaughtering on microbial dynamics and contamination of sheep meat.
    Omer MK; Hauge SJ; Østensvik Ø; Moen B; Alvseike O; Røtterud OJ; Prieto M; Dommersnes S; Nesteng OH; Nesbakken T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 194():7-14. PubMed ID: 25461602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between broiler chicken carcasses with and without visible faecal contamination during the slaughtering process on hazard identification of Salmonella spp.
    Jiménez SM; Salsi MS; Tiburzi MC; Pirovani ME
    J Appl Microbiol; 2002; 93(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 12234342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcass during slaughter.
    Vaarala A; Korkeala H
    Acta Vet Scand; 1994; 35(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 7676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of Salmonella carcass contamination by a comparative quantitative analysis of E. coli and Salmonella during pig slaughter.
    Nauta M; Barfod K; Hald T; Sørensen AH; Emborg HD; Aabo S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 166(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 23973833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the hygienic performance of a sheep carcass dressing process.
    Gill CO; Baker LP
    J Food Prot; 1998 Mar; 61(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 9708305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources and extent of microbiological contamination of beef carcasses in seven United States slaughtering plants.
    Sofos JN; Kochevar SL; Bellinger GR; Buege DR; Hancock DD; Ingham SC; Morgan JB; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10030632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological monitoring of sheep carcass contamination in three Swiss abattoirs.
    Zweifel C; Stephan R
    J Food Prot; 2003 Jun; 66(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 12800993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two evisceration methods on hygienic quality in the pelvic area of sheep carcasses.
    Røssvoll E; Røtterud OJ; Hauge SJ; Alvseike O
    Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():134-138. PubMed ID: 29179139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.