BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8973707)

  • 1. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Makhdoum M; van den Brink JL; Stollman MH; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Nov; 116(6):785-90. PubMed ID: 8973707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
    Audiology; 1997; 36(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 9099406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Maurer J; Collet L; Pelster H; Truy E; Gallégo S
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Dec; 112(12):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12461344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delayed Auditory Brainstem Responses in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lammers MJ; van Eijl RH; van Zanten GA; Versnel H; Grolman W
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 26162414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Makhdoum MJ; Groenen PA; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9505287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered cortical activity in prelingually deafened cochlear implant users following long periods of auditory deprivation.
    Lammers MJ; Versnel H; van Zanten GA; Grolman W
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 25315357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electric auditory brain-stem responses in nucleus multichannel cochlear implant users.
    Hodges AV; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Balkany TJ
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1994 Oct; 120(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 7917192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory neuropathy: an update.
    Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):102S-106S. PubMed ID: 17496659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
    Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Morgon A
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):554-9. PubMed ID: 9546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects.
    Kubo T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Matsukawa M; Doi K; Tamura M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 11349791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant patients.
    Kasper A; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):285-94. PubMed ID: 1475097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-Modal and Intra-Modal Characteristics of Visual Function and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened, Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kim MB; Shim HY; Jin SH; Kang S; Woo J; Han JC; Lee JY; Kim M; Cho YS; Moon IJ; Hong SH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148466. PubMed ID: 26848755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.