These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8973956)

  • 1. A quantitative method for comparing and evaluating manual prosthetic socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Johnson F
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Dec; 4(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 8973956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
    Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A preliminary investigation into the development of 3-D printing of prosthetic sockets.
    Herbert N; Simpson D; Spence WD; Ion W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 15944878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees.
    Saunders CG; Foort J; Bannon M; Lean D; Panych L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 4000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoping review to evaluate existing measurement parameters and clinical outcomes of transtibial prosthetic alignment and socket fit.
    Won NY; Paul A; Garibaldi M; Baumgartner RE; Kaufman KR; Reider L; Wrigley J; Morshed S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 35412519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment technique for computer-aided manufactured sockets.
    Sanders JE; Severance MR
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(7):763-74. PubMed ID: 21938663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the influence of cyclic loading on a laser sintered transtibial prosthetic socket using Digital Image Correlation (DIC).
    Saey T; Muraru L; Raeve E; Cuppens K; Balcaen R; Creylman V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5382-5385. PubMed ID: 31947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 2-generating person-specific candidate designs using multi-objective genetic algorithms.
    Steer JW; Grudniewski PA; Browne M; Worsley PR; Sobey AJ; Dickinson AS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1347-1360. PubMed ID: 31741116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit.
    Polliack AA; Craig DD; Sieh RC; Landsberger S; Mcneal DR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Apr; 26(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 12043923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an integrated CAD-FEA process for below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Goh JC; Lee PV; Toh SL; Ooi CK
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Jul; 20(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 15927736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A photoelastic clinical study of the static load distribution at the stump/socket interface of PTB sockets.
    Sewell P; Vinney J; Noroozi S; Amali R; Andrews S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 16466158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A CAD analysis programme for prosthetics and orthotics.
    Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 7991360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in prosthetics.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Jul; (256):39-43. PubMed ID: 2364620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences and trends of various shape-capture methods on outcomes in trans-tibial prosthetics: A systematic review.
    Suyi Yang E; Aslani N; McGarry A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):540-555. PubMed ID: 31364475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shape sensing for computer aided below-knee prosthetic socket design.
    Fernie GR; Griggs G; Bartlett S; Lunau K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1985 Apr; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 4000905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.