These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8974146)

  • 1. Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography.
    Avendanio B; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Dec; 82(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 8974146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
    Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 8181644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Steinhoff M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18550517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 7835511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organ absorbed doses in intraoral dental radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Nov; 66(791):1035-41. PubMed ID: 8281379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the geometry of the intraoral position-indicating device on effective dose.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jul; 84(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 9247960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multimodal radiography: a new imaging technique and system for oral diagnosis.
    Tammisalo EH; Tammisalo T
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 1896438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8593910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.
    Mah JK; Danforth RA; Bumann A; Hatcher D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 14561979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
    Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices.
    Schilling R; Geibel MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120273. PubMed ID: 23420855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of detailed zonography with periapical radiography for the detection of periapical lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Rosberg J; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 May; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 9515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.