89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8975494)
1. [Radiation burden in invasive cardiac diagnosis: extent, factors of influence and references for minimizing radiation dosage].
Kuon E; Lang E
Z Kardiol; 1996 Aug; 85(8):543-52. PubMed ID: 8975494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized comparison between rotational and standard coronary angiography.
Rigattieri S; Ghini AS; Silvestri P; Tommasino A; Ferraiuolo G; Palamara A; Loschiavo P
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2005 Feb; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15788975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures.
Cusma JT; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Taubel JP; Holmes DR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 9973023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization procedures.
Bakalyar DM; Castellani MD; Safian RD
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Oct; 42(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 9328690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems.
Chida K; Morishima Y; Inaba Y; Taura M; Ebata A; Takeda K; Shimura H; Zuguchi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22117021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. X-ray-ted.
Brinker JA
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Oct; 42(2):128-9. PubMed ID: 9328692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.
Kuon E; Dahm JB; Robinson DM; Empen K; Günther M; Wucherer W
Z Kardiol; 2005 Oct; 94(10):663-73. PubMed ID: 16200481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention.
Fransson SG; Persliden J
Acta Radiol; 2000 Mar; 41(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 10741786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of patient and staff exposure with state of the art X-ray technology in cardiac catheterization: A randomized controlled trial.
Buytaert D; Eloot L; Mauti M; Drieghe B; Gheeraert P; Taeymans Y; Bacher K
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):807-814. PubMed ID: 30168209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography using 5 French preformed (Judkins) catheters from the percutaneous right brachial approach: a comparative analysis with the femoral approach.
Bush CA; VanFossen DB; Kolibash AJ; Magorien RD; Bacon JP; Ansel GM; Eaton GM; Ramancik MJ; Orsini AR; Palmer SL
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Aug; 29(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 8221844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient dosimetry during coronary interventions: a comprehensive analysis.
Efstathopoulos EP; Karvouni E; Kottou S; Tzanalaridou E; Korovesis S; Giazitzoglou E; Katritsis DG
Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 14999196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation exposure: clueless in the cath lab, or sayonara ALARA.
Watson RM
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Oct; 42(2):126-7. PubMed ID: 9328691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation into patient and staff doses from X-ray angiography during coronary interventional procedures.
Morrish OW; Goldstone KE
Br J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 81(961):35-45. PubMed ID: 18039722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system.
Inaba Y; Chida K; Shirotori K; Shimura H; Yanagawa I; Zuguchi M; Takahashi S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21081517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England.
Broadhead DA; Chapple CL; Faulkner K; Davies ML; McCallum H
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):492-7. PubMed ID: 9227231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-source CT coronary angiography: effectiveness of radiation dose reduction with lower tube voltage.
Sabarudin A; Md Yusof AK; Tay MF; Ng KH; Sun Z
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 153(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 22807493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
