These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8975679)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus number and target-to-distractor ratio on the performance of random array letter cancellation tasks.
    Geldmacher DS
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Dec; 32(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 8975679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus characteristics determine processing approach on random array letter-cancellation tasks.
    Geldmacher DS
    Brain Cogn; 1998 Apr; 36(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 9647683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus effects on cancellation task performance in children with and without dyslexia.
    Huang HC; Wang TY
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):539-45. PubMed ID: 19363196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target-to-distractor ratio effects on decision time in the orderly array shape cancellation task.
    Nakajima Y; Ikeda Y; Okuzumi H
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Oct; 113(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 24597434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age effects on random-array letter cancellation tests.
    Geldmacher DS; Riedel TM
    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 1999 Jan; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10082331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury.
    Geldmacher DS; Hills EC
    Brain Inj; 1997 Jan; 11(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 9012552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.
    Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancellation task in very low educated people.
    Brucki SM; Nitrini R
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Mar; 23(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18178373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemisphere asymmetry in schizophrenia as revealed through line bisection, line trisection, and letter cancellation.
    Zivotofsky AZ; Edelman S; Green T; Fostick L; Strous RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():70-9. PubMed ID: 17320827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?
    Spaethe J; Tautz J; Chittka L
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Mar; 209(Pt 6):987-93. PubMed ID: 16513924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility to illusions and performance on visuospatial tasks in individuals with autism.
    Ropar D; Mitchell P
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 May; 42(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 11383970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lorazepam induces multiple disturbances in selective attention: attentional overload, decrement in target processing efficiency, and shifts in perceptual discrimination and response bias.
    Michael GA; Bacon E; Offerlin-Meyer I
    J Psychopharmacol; 2007 Sep; 21(7):691-9. PubMed ID: 17259205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distractor variation on auditory selective attention.
    Tong Y; Melara RD
    Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 1166():110-23. PubMed ID: 17669371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye-tracking measures and human performance in a vigilance task.
    Lavine RA; Sibert JL; Gokturk M; Dickens B
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Apr; 73(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 11952058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-of-day dependent performance efficiency in student nurses.
    Mathur K; Bhattacharya SK
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1991 Jun; 20(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1820382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-related potentials elicited by distractors in an auditory oddball paradigm in schizophrenia.
    Kogoj A; Pirtosek Z; Tomori M; Vodusek DB
    Psychiatry Res; 2005 Nov; 137(1-2):49-59. PubMed ID: 16214220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual task performance in a healthy young adult population: results from a symmetric manipulation of task complexity and articulation.
    Armieri A; Holmes JD; Spaulding SJ; Jenkins ME; Johnson AM
    Gait Posture; 2009 Feb; 29(2):346-8. PubMed ID: 18951799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.