These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8976913)

  • 1. Breast cancer in women 65-74 years old: earlier detection by mammographic screening.
    Gabriel H; Wilson TE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8976913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic screening in women more than 64 years old: a comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals.
    Field LR; Wilson TE; Strawderman M; Gabriel H; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Apr; 170(4):961-5. PubMed ID: 9530044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neglecting to screen women between 40 and 49 years old with mammography: what is the impact on treatment morbidity and potential risk reduction?
    Plecha D; Salem N; Kremer M; Pham R; Downs-Holmes C; Sattar A; Lyons J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 24450666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer in the elderly patient: early detection with mammography.
    Wilson TE; Helvie MA; August DA
    Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):203-7. PubMed ID: 8259405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.
    Burrell HC; Sibbering DM; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Evans AJ; Yeoman LJ; Elston CW; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Robertson JF
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 8638010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
    Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations.
    Ikeda DM; Andersson I; Wattsgård C; Janzon L; Linell F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 1632342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
    Shen N; Hammonds LS; Madsen D; Dale P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in patients with nonpalpable breast carcinomas.
    Wazer DE; Gage I; Homer MJ; Krosnick SH; Schmid C
    Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7):1432-7. PubMed ID: 8839548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ; Evans AJ; Cornford EJ; Burrell HC; James JJ; Lee AH; Chakrabarti J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between mammographic screening intervals and size and histology of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Carlson KL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Kleer CG; Oberman HA; Wilson TE; Pollak EW; Rochester AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 9930774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women.
    Lundgren B; Helleberg A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Mar; 68(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 6950165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.