These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8976913)

  • 21. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.
    Domingo L; Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Sala M; Lynge E
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22943386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Stockholm Mammographic Screening Trial: Risks and benefits in age group 40-49 years.
    Frisell J; Lidbrink E
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):49-51. PubMed ID: 9709275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survey on mammographic screening among women aged 40 to 65 years old at polyclinics.
    Leong HS; Heng R; Emmanuel SC
    Singapore Med J; 2007 Jan; 48(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 17245514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early indicators of the effect of a breast cancer screening program for low-income women.
    Schootman M; Fuortes LJ
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2001; 25(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 11341349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.
    Frankel SD; Sickles EA; Curpen BN; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1107-9. PubMed ID: 7717214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.
    Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Kurek R; Motykie G; Martz CH; Rabbitt S
    Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):731-5; discussion 735-6. PubMed ID: 10432082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The effect of mammographic screening on tumor size, axillary node status and the degree of histologic anaplasia].
    Garami Z; Benkó K; Kósa C; Fülöp B; Lukács G
    Magy Seb; 2006 Oct; 59(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 17201347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of screening on breast cancer detection. Retrospective comparative study of two periods ten years apart.
    Aubard Y; Genet D; Eyraud JL; Clavère P; Tubiana-Mathieu N; Philippe HJ
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2002; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11876389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment?
    Maes RM; Dronkers DJ; Hendriks JH; Thijssen MA; Nab HW
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():34-38. PubMed ID: 9059292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.
    Joensuu H; Lehtimäki T; Holli K; Elomaa L; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Kataja V; Anttila A; Lundin M; Isola J; Lundin J
    JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(9):1064-73. PubMed ID: 15339900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammographic Screening at Age 40 or 45? What Difference Does It Make? The Potential Impact of American Cancer Society Mammography Screening Guidelines.
    Fancher CE; Scott A; Allen A; Dale P
    Am Surg; 2017 Aug; 83(8):847-849. PubMed ID: 28822389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognostic significance of mammographic detection in a cohort of conservatively treated breast cancer patients.
    Haffty BG; Lee C; Philpotts L; Horvath L; Ward B; McKhann C; Tocino I
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1998; 4(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9467044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer in women who undergo screening mammography: relationship of hormone replacement therapy to stage and detection method.
    Roubidoux MA; Wilson TE; Orange RJ; Fitzgerald JT; Helvie MA; Packer SA
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):725-8. PubMed ID: 9722852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence.
    Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Parvinen I; Holli K; Kronqvist P; Pylkkänen L; Helenius H; Kaljonen A; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 15611974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 7997552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.