151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8976914)
21. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: an uncertain harm-benefit balance.
Prescrire Int; 2013 Dec; 22(144):298-303. PubMed ID: 24600734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?
Ganott MA; Sumkin JH; King JL; Klym AH; Catullo VJ; Cohen CS; Gur D
Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 16505392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Results of monitoring the year 2002 of the Hungarian breast cancer screening program].
Boncz I; Hoffer G; Sebestyén A; Dózsa C; Ember I
Magy Onkol; 2005; 49(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 16249805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Thoresen S; Tretli S
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1501-7. PubMed ID: 15378474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening behaviors and long-term compliance with mammography guidelines in a breast cancer screening program.
Weinberg AD; Cooper HP; Lane M; Kripalani S
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9037339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patient relatives; implementation of guidelines formulated by the Netherlands College of General Practitioners].
Duijm LE; Zaat JO; Guit GL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(14):778-81. PubMed ID: 9646610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Expansion of screening mammography in the Veterans Health Administration: implications for breast cancer treatment.
Kvasnovsky CL; Kesmodel SB; Gragasin JL; Punnoose V; Johnson PA; Goel R; Reddy SK; Pierson RN; Jain A
JAMA Surg; 2013 Nov; 148(11):999-1004. PubMed ID: 24048217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [1989 Basel Mammography Action].
Laffer U; Almendral AC; Benz UF; Burckhardt B; Duplain H; Gaudenz R; Grosjean M; Marugg S; Marx A; Nidecker A
Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 1526829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patients: should the mastectomy site be imaged?
Fajardo LL; Roberts CC; Hunt KR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):953-5. PubMed ID: 8273633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen. Results of the first screening round].
Jørgensen T; Jensen LB; Duun S; Hirsch FR; Mouridsen HT; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Christensen LH; Hansen AG; Nissen FH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(9):1212-7. PubMed ID: 8644425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Effect of Breast Implants on Mammogram Outcomes.
Kam K; Lee E; Pairawan S; Anderson K; Cora C; Bae W; Senthil M; Solomon N; Lum S
Am Surg; 2015 Oct; 81(10):1053-6. PubMed ID: 26463307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical outcomes of a breast cancer-screening program for low-income women.
Jimenez-Lee R; Oslak SG; Hedberg K; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 2003 Aug; 138(8):884-90. PubMed ID: 12912748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography.
Slanetz PJ; Giardino AA; McCarthy KA; Hall DA; Halpern EF; Moore RH; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1539-41. PubMed ID: 9609170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently.
Dee KE; Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):729-33. PubMed ID: 11222214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
