These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8977882)

  • 1. A new stereotest: the double two rod test.
    Fan WC; Brown B; Yap MK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 8977882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.
    Holmes JM; Fawcett SL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):193-5. PubMed ID: 15652852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotest: results for adult observers.
    Fricke T; Siderov J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9196674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of head tilt on stereopsis.
    Lam DY; Cheng TL; Kirschen DG; Laby DM
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2008; 23(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18702612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoacuity testing: an illusion of tilt when viewing two parallel vertical rods or lines.
    Larson WL; Gresset J; Bolduc M; Thibault L
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):632-6. PubMed ID: 3177588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
    González EG; Weinstock M; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving and acting in depth in Williams syndrome and typical development.
    Hudson KD; Farran EK
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1850-5. PubMed ID: 24794320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest.
    Garnham L; Sloper JJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 16361675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stereoacuity and depth perception decrease with increased instrument magnification: comparing a non-magnified system with lens loupes and a surgical microscope.
    Du LT; Wessels IF; Underdahl JP; Auran JD
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest.
    van Doorn LL; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; Fortuin MF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 24355036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distance impairs postural stability only under binocular viewing.
    Lê TT; Kapoula Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3586-93. PubMed ID: 16899270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of monocular and binocular depth cues based on natural images: a LORETA analysis.
    Fischmeister FP; Bauer H
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3373-80. PubMed ID: 16828836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian model of binocular perception of 3D mirror symmetrical polyhedra.
    Li Y; Sawada T; Shi Y; Kwon T; Pizlo Z
    J Vis; 2011 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 21505106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.