These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8977892)

  • 1. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.
    Rosenfield M; Cohen AS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 8977892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.
    León AÁ; Medrano SM; Rosenfield M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 22268597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability intraexaminer and agreement in amplitude of accommodation measurements.
    Antona B; Barra F; Barrio A; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18791730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of heterophoria measurement technique on the clinical accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio.
    Escalante JB; Rosenfield M
    Optometry; 2006 May; 77(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 16651213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
    Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of subjective heterophoria testing with a phoropter and trial frame.
    Casillas Casillas E; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 16614580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.
    Win-Hall DM; Ostrin LA; Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 84(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 17873774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements.
    Antona B; Sanchez I; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 19663924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of target distance on accommodative amplitude measured using the minus lens technique.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Wolffsohn JS; Azimi A; Babaei-Malekkolaei E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Jan; 97(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 23889500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing measurement techniques of accommodative amplitudes.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Kundart J; Askarizadeh F
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 62(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 25005195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accommodative amplitude using the minus lens at different near distances.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ng JS; Cesana BM; Yekta AA; Sedaghat MR
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 65(3):223-227. PubMed ID: 28440251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of two subjective accommodative amplitude measurements and agreement with an objective method.
    Chen Y; Zhang C; Ding C; Tao C; Bao J; Zheng J; Chen H
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Jul; 102(4):412-417. PubMed ID: 30866109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic retinoscopy and accommodation.
    Whitefoot H; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 1584622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability and agreement in the measurement of horizontal fusional vergences.
    Antona B; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 18761485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing Different Methods of Measuring Accommodative Amplitude with Hofstetter's Normative Values in a Ghanaian Population.
    Abu EK; Ocansey S; Yennu J; Asirifi I; Marfo R
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Sep; 43(9):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 29787692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anterior segment changes with age and during accommodation measured with partial coherence interferometry.
    Tsorbatzoglou A; Németh G; Széll N; Biró Z; Berta A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1597-601. PubMed ID: 17720076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of accommodation amplitudes in pseudophakic eyes measured with three different methods.
    Nemeth G; Tsorbatzoglou A; Vamosi P; Sohajda Z; Berta A
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Jan; 22(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16858433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of amplitude of accommodation among Ghanaian school children.
    Ovenseri-Ogbomo GO; Kudjawu EP; Kio FE; Abu EK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2012 Mar; 95(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 22260310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The amplitude of accommodation in 6-10-year-old children - not as good as expected!
    Sterner B; Gellerstedt M; Sjöström A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 May; 24(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 15130174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.