552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8978338)
1. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Cutler CS; Lemmel GT; Rahmani EY; Clark DW; Helper DJ; Lehman GA; Mark DG
Gastroenterology; 1997 Jan; 112(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8978338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lower Adenoma Miss Rate of Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy vs Routine White-Light Colonoscopy in a Prospective Tandem Study.
Wang P; Liu P; Glissen Brown JR; Berzin TM; Zhou G; Lei S; Liu X; Li L; Xiao X
Gastroenterology; 2020 Oct; 159(4):1252-1261.e5. PubMed ID: 32562721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
Stoffel EM; Turgeon DK; Stockwell DH; Zhao L; Normolle DP; Tuck MK; Bresalier RS; Marcon NE; Baron JA; Ruffin MT; Brenner DE; Syngal S;
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2008 Nov; 1(6):470-5. PubMed ID: 19138994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Miss Rate for Colorectal Adenoma Determined by Quality-Adjusted, Back-to-Back Colonoscopies.
Ahn SB; Han DS; Bae JH; Byun TJ; Kim JP; Eun CS
Gut Liver; 2012 Jan; 6(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 22375173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.
Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO
Anderson JC; Kahi CJ; Sullivan A; MacPhail M; Garcia J; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):591-598. PubMed ID: 30367879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates.
Hewett DG; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Oct; 72(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 20579648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps.
van den Broek FJ; Fockens P; Van Eeden S; Kara MA; Hardwick JC; Reitsma JB; Dekker E
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 7(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19168154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens.
Postic G; Lewin D; Bickerstaff C; Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Dec; 97(12):3182-5. PubMed ID: 12492208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.
Kaltenbach T; Friedland S; Soetikno R
Gut; 2008 Oct; 57(10):1406-12. PubMed ID: 18523025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.
Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; O'Brien MJ; Ho MN; Gottlieb L; Sternberg SS; Waye JD; Bond J; Schapiro M; Stewart ET
N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr; 328(13):901-6. PubMed ID: 8446136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?].
Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.
Harrison M; Singh N; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Mar; 99(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 15056095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy.
Villavicencio RT; Rex DK
Semin Gastrointest Dis; 2000 Oct; 11(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 11057946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial.
Papanikolaou IS; Apostolopoulos P; Tziatzios G; Vlachou E; Sioulas AD; Polymeros D; Karameris A; Panayiotides I; Alexandrakis G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K
Endoscopy; 2017 May; 49(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28107765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a tandem colonoscopy study].
Choi HN; Kim HH; Oh JS; Jang HS; Hwang HS; Kim EY; Kwon JG; Jung JT
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25073668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
