These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8978532)

  • 1. Modeling Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments: Finding the Proper Branch of the Correct (Multinomial) Tree.
    Draine SC; Greenwald AG; Banaji MR
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Mar; 5(/2):221-5. PubMed ID: 8978532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling unconscious gender bias in fame judgments: finding the proper branch of the correct (multinomial) tree.
    Draine SC; Greenwald AG; Banaji MR
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):221-5. PubMed ID: 8733932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating fame judgments: on the generality of hypotheses, conclusions, and measurement models.
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):226-31. PubMed ID: 8733933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating Fame Judgments: On the Generality of Hypotheses, Conclusions, and Measurement Models.
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Mar; 5(1/2):226-31. PubMed ID: 8978533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):197-220. PubMed ID: 8733931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unconscious Gender Bias in Fame Judgments?
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Mar; 5(1/2):197-220. PubMed ID: 8978531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender stereotyping and decision processes: extending and reversing the gender bias in fame judgments.
    Buchner A; Steffens MC; Berry DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11009254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender bias in fame judgments: implicit gender stereotyping or matching study phase fame?
    Steffens MC; Buchner A; Mecklenbräuker S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 16235635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: approaches, assumptions, and evaluation.
    Wainwright MJ; Reingold EM
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):232-54. PubMed ID: 8733934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.
    Banaji MR; Greenwald AG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1995 Feb; 68(2):181-98. PubMed ID: 7877095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response Bias Correction in the Process Dissociation Procedure: Approaches, Assumptions, and Evaluation.
    Wainwright MJ; Reingold EM
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Mar; 5(1/2):232-54. PubMed ID: 8978534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge.
    Dienes Z
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 168():49-64. PubMed ID: 18166385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of mood and analytic and intuitive judgement tendencies in the "false-fame" effect].
    Hänze M
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1996; 204(2):149-66. PubMed ID: 8659209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Slip technique, process dissociation model and multinomial modeling: new tools for experimental detection of "Freudian slips"].
    Bröder A; Bredenkamp J
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 9005024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?
    Logan P; Ramachandran G; Mulhausen J; Hewett P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19332428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: validation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth.
    Hilbig BE
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 22832179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005).
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 15709876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response bias correction in the process dissociation procedure: a reevaluation?
    Reingold EM; Wainwright MJ
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 9063618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.