These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8980321)
1. Quality patrol. A cutting cost analysis of hysterectomies. Appleby C Hosp Health Netw; 1996 Nov; 70(22):42. PubMed ID: 8980321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hysterectomy debate focuses on cost efficiency, quality. Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1997 May; 2(5):75-7. PubMed ID: 10175070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison. Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis. Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran PS; Harrington P; Flattery M; Murphy L; Ryan M BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1546-53. PubMed ID: 24810140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers. Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis. O'Sullivan OE; Hewitt M; O'Reilly BA BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):144-5. PubMed ID: 25545909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis. Ind T; McIndoe A; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Prietzel-Meyer N; Smith JR; Nobbenhuis M; Gillespie A; Ellis P; Bali A; Elghobashy A; Moss E BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):754. PubMed ID: 25800387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: does it work?: a bicontinental review of the literature and clinical commentary. Munro MG; Deprest J Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 38(2):401-25. PubMed ID: 7554607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Authors' reply. Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran PS; Harrington P; Murphy L; Ryan M BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):754-5. PubMed ID: 25800388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy. Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Bijen CB; Vermeulen KM; Mourits MJ; Arts HJ; Ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Wijma J; Bongers MY; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21215439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]