These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8980321)

  • 1. Quality patrol. A cutting cost analysis of hysterectomies.
    Appleby C
    Hosp Health Netw; 1996 Nov; 70(22):42. PubMed ID: 8980321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hysterectomy debate focuses on cost efficiency, quality.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1997 May; 2(5):75-7. PubMed ID: 10175070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.
    Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
    Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.
    Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran PS; Harrington P; Flattery M; Murphy L; Ryan M
    BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1546-53. PubMed ID: 24810140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.
    O'Sullivan OE; Hewitt M; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):144-5. PubMed ID: 25545909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.
    Ind T; McIndoe A; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Prietzel-Meyer N; Smith JR; Nobbenhuis M; Gillespie A; Ellis P; Bali A; Elghobashy A; Moss E
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):754. PubMed ID: 25800387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies.
    Nezhat C; Bess O; Admon D; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):713-6. PubMed ID: 8164929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Authors' reply: Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.
    Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran PS; Harrington P; Flattery M; Murphy L; Ryan M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):145-6. PubMed ID: 25545910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach.
    Kovac SR
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 24351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.
    Pasic RP; Rizzo JA; Fang H; Ross S; Moore M; Gunnarsson C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 20850391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Garry R
    BJOG; 2002 Dec; 109(12):1428; author reply 1429. PubMed ID: 12505004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation in laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Brolmann HA; Bongers MY; Bremer GL; van der Salm PC
    BJOG; 2002 Dec; 109(12):1427-8; author reply 1428. PubMed ID: 12505003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Reynisson P; Persson J
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 23603368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: does it work?: a bicontinental review of the literature and clinical commentary.
    Munro MG; Deprest J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 38(2):401-25. PubMed ID: 7554607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Authors' reply.
    Teljeur C; O'Neill M; Moran PS; Harrington P; Murphy L; Ryan M
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):754-5. PubMed ID: 25800388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.
    Bijen CB; Vermeulen KM; Mourits MJ; Arts HJ; Ter Brugge HG; van der Sijde R; Wijma J; Bongers MY; van der Zee AG; de Bock GH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21215439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.