146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8980416)
1. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
Schröger E
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range.
Schröger E
Neuroreport; 1994 Mar; 5(7):825-8. PubMed ID: 8018858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures.
Novitski N; Tervaniemi M; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 20(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 15130586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?
Deacon D; Nousak JM; Pilotti M; Ritter W; Yang CM
Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 9643055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Mismatch negativity (MMN) to very short interval between regular tones].
Jiang DM; Paavilainen P; Lavikainen J; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1994 Dec; 46(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 7878484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study.
Pekkonen E; Rinne T; Reinikainen K; Kujala T; Alho K; Näätänen R
Exp Aging Res; 1996; 22(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 8735151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change.
He C; Hotson L; Trainor LJ
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):218-29. PubMed ID: 18722392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results.
Opitz B; Rinne T; Mecklinger A; von Cramon DY; Schröger E
Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 11771985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Localizing pre-attentive auditory memory-based comparison: magnetic mismatch negativity to pitch change.
Maess B; Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Friederici AD
Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(2):561-71. PubMed ID: 17596966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the failure to detect stimulus deviance during sleep due to a rapid fading of sensory memory or a degradation of stimulus encoding?
Sabri M; Campbell KB
J Sleep Res; 2005 Jun; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15910509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-attentive and attentive processing of temporal and frequency characteristics within long sounds.
Grimm S; Schröger E
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 16253485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
Kujala T; Aho E; Lepistö T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R
Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17257732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system.
Grimm S; Schröger E
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):241-9. PubMed ID: 17943002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Listen up! Processing of intensity change differs for vocal and nonvocal sounds.
Schirmer A; Simpson E; Escoffier N
Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1176():103-12. PubMed ID: 17900543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ERP correlates of pre-attentive processing of Cantonese lexical tones: The effects of pitch contour and pitch height.
Tsang YK; Jia S; Huang J; Chen HC
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20970477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in emotional tone and instrumental timbre are reflected by the mismatch negativity.
Goydke KN; Altenmüller E; Möller J; Münte TF
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15511651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
