168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8980428)
1. Infrared optoelectronic volumetry, the ideal way to measure limb volume.
Tierney S; Aslam M; Rennie K; Grace P
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 12(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 8980428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of lower limb volume: agreement between the vertically oriented perometer and a tape measure method.
Tan CW; Coutts F; Bulley C
Physiotherapy; 2013 Sep; 99(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 23351956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct and indirect methods for the quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volumetry, the disk model method and the frustum sign model method, using the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement.
Kaulesar Sukul DM; den Hoed PT; Johannes EJ; van Dolder R; Benda E
J Biomed Eng; 1993 Nov; 15(6):477-80. PubMed ID: 8277752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of different methods to quantify the volume of horse limbs].
Haase F; Siewert C; von Rautenfeld DB; Fischbach JU; Seifert H
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(3-4):126-31. PubMed ID: 19350812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The validity and reliability of the Perometer in evaluating human knee volume.
Man IO; Markland KL; Morrissey MC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 15522044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of different assessment techniques for measuring foot and ankle volume in healthy adults.
Friends J; Augustine E; Danoff J
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2008; 98(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 18347115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement Between Optoelectronic Volumetry and Circumferential Girth Measurements to Diagnose Lymphedema in Patients Submitted to Axillary Radical Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma.
Campanholi LL; Baiocchi JMT; Batista BN; Bergmann A; Fregnani JHTG; Duprat Neto JP
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):568-572. PubMed ID: 33555979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The reliability of leg circumference assessment: a comparison of spring tape measurements and optoelectronic volumetry.
Labs KH; Tschoepl M; Gamba G; Aschwanden M; Jaeger KA
Vasc Med; 2000; 5(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 10943582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study.
Engelberger RP; Blazek C; Amsler F; Keo HH; Baumann F; Blättler W; Baumgartner I; Willenberg T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Oct; 11():138. PubMed ID: 21974893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining lower limb lymphedema after inguinal or ilio-inguinal dissection in patients with melanoma using classification and regression tree analysis.
Spillane AJ; Saw RP; Tucker M; Byth K; Thompson JF
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18650640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding lower leg volume measurements used in clinical studies focused on venous leg edema.
Rabe E; Carpentier P; Maggioli A
Int Angiol; 2018 Dec; 37(6):437-443. PubMed ID: 30256052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement between Perometry and Sequential Arm Circumference Measurements in Objective Determination of Arm Volume.
Batista BN; Baiocchi JMT; Campanholi LL; Bergmann A; Duprat JP
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2018 Jan; 34(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 28841735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limb circumference measurement for recording edema volume in patients with filarial lymphedema.
Pani SP; Vanamail P; Yuvaraj J
Lymphology; 1995 Jun; 28(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 7564492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semiautomated thyroid volumetry using 3D CT: prospective comparison with measurements obtained using 2D ultrasound, 2D CT, and water displacement method of specimen.
Lee SJ; Chong S; Kang KH; Hur J; Hong BW; Kim HJ; Kim SJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):W525-32. PubMed ID: 25341167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
