These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. South African psychiatrists' attitudes to the present implementation of the Abortion and Sterilisation Act of 1975. Nash ES; Brink JH; Potocnik FC; Dirks BL S Afr Med J; 1992 Dec; 82(6):434-6. PubMed ID: 1465697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Allied health board on abortion: Patients have to be favored more than the personnel]. Lakartidningen; 1975 Dec; 72(51):5042. PubMed ID: 1195946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The indications for therapeutic abortion: an obstetrician's point of view. de Villiers JN S Afr Med J; 1968 Jul; 42(28):718-21. PubMed ID: 5673425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of legalized abortion in England. O'Sullivan JV Hosp Prog; 1971 Jun; 52(6):75-8. PubMed ID: 5089672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Abortion laws in other countries]. Strutz E Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 May; 32(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 5065266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion--some practical and ethical considerations. Benatar SR; Abels C; Abratt R; Anthony J; Benatar D; Brooks D; Degenaar J; Dent D; de Villiers M; Dommisse J S Afr Med J; 1994 Aug; 84(8 Pt 1):469-72. PubMed ID: 7825078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Mississippi State Medical Association statement on abortion. Gilmore JO J Miss State Med Assoc; 1974 Jan; 15(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 4809690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Separation-survivability--the elusive moral cut-off point? Larsen JV S Afr Med J; 2006 Nov; 96(11):1140; author reply 1142-4. PubMed ID: 17167693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion objectors--further points. Eksteen FJ; Moll AP; van der Merwe TL S Afr Med J; 1997 Nov; 87(11):1557-8. PubMed ID: 9472289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New laws bring new approaches. Method for the evaluation of therapeutic abortion candidates meets the requirements of California state law and the needs of patients, while conserving the time of the medical staff. Loos S; Mikkelsen C Hospitals; 1972 Jul; 46(14):76-9. PubMed ID: 5055360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Logistic problems of legal abortion. Overstreet EW Am J Public Health; 1971 Mar; 61(3):496-9. PubMed ID: 5553637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion--1970. Gold EM Am J Public Health; 1971 Mar; 61(3):487-8. PubMed ID: 5553635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Letter: Attitudes to abortions. Br Med J; 1974 Jun; 2(5917):501. PubMed ID: 4834110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Health legislation. Abortion: a survey of current legislation. WHO Chron; 1971 Jul; 25(7):328-33. PubMed ID: 5563186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion: physician and hospital attitudes. Hall RE Am J Public Health; 1971 Mar; 61(3):517-9. PubMed ID: 5553640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The case for abortion law reform. Bretherton RC Med J Aust; 1969 Oct; 2(17):860-2. PubMed ID: 5352870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Attitudes and practices of North Carolina obstetricians: the impact of the North Carolina Abortion Act of 1967. Walker WB; Hulka JF South Med J; 1971 Apr; 64(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 5552016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]